Stay updated with breaking news from Guiding post. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
. well, look at that. the supreme court is right where it did not want to be, smack dab in the middle maybe of the 2024 election with the first votes in just a few days, tonight on laura coates live. okay. so if we re being honest, we knew this day was coming, right? i mean even if the supreme court did not want this day to come, they re probably still recovering a little bit from bush v. gore, and this seems to be the worst kind of deja vu. maybe that s why after several hours behind closed doors talking today, drum roll, please, the supreme court said yes to the dress. they will decide whether donald trump, the former president of the united states, one who is trying to become the president yet again, can even actually be on a ballot after his role on january 6th. well, which ballot? well, this one concerns colorado, but the supreme court knows that the floodgates, they re about to open. it s already been and i can t believe it either three years as of tomorro ....
well, look at that. the supreme court is right where it did not want to be, smack dab in the middle of the 2024 election with the first votes in just a few days. tonight on laura coates live . okay, so if we are being honest, drumroll please, the supreme court said yes. they will decide whether donald trump, former president of the united states, one who is trying to become president again, can be on the ballot after his role in january 6. which ballot? this one concerns colorado, but the supreme court noted the floodgates are about to open. it has already been, and i can t believe either, three years tomorrow since the attack you are seeing on the screen. and while prosecutors have been dragged for taking so long to get the prosecutorial ball rolling, the court not known for lightning speed, now they are wasting no time. the oral arguments are set for february 8. donald trump saying just a little while ago that he hopes the justices he appointed will be, i will use hi ....
that title 42 is not an immigration policy it was actually implemented as a public health measure to try to stop the spread of communicable disease. the ending of title 42 is appropriate because we are now beyond the pandemic and it has officially ended. the biden administration does have challenges at the border because all that title 42 did was effectively dismantle our asylum process and create a bottleneck at the southern border. the lifting of that, obviously, means that we are going to see greater numbers of people coming to the border. the biden administration is doing everything that they can with the resources that they have to try to address the challenges there but that is fundamentally not going to stop until we do something legislatively, until we pass a legislative solution that overhauls our broken immigration system and it is on congress to do that. this week the republicans introduced their child deportation bill which is in and for not going to fix ....
Anything other than the law, which might turn out in trumps favor in this instance, would be the guiding post. judges certainly say that. now in practice, in any case, especially hard cases, and this is a hard case. the reason why this case is difficult is because the particular provision of the constitution, section 3 of the 14th amendment, deals with what happens if an official who formerly was in very high office then engages in an insurrection against the united states. we are very fortunate as a country that that has not happened very much, so there is no case law on it. the problem with cases where there is not a lot of case law is that judges often really can decide those cases however they want, because there isn t any authority telling them they have to decide it one way or the other. what could go wrong with reverse engineering a solution of something so constant uncial? ....
You don t say that kind of thing. i mean brett kavanaugh is a conservative guy. he was vetted by the trump white house because they thought that he would normally do the sort of stuff that the trump white house wants a justice to do. but that doesn t mean that he s not a human being. it doesn t mean that he doesn t care about his professional representation. if there s any law students out there listening to this interview, my advice to all of them is never say that thing about a judge you are appearing in front of. by the way, we re talking about the colorado case, but they ve got other things like the immunity discussion, whether a president would have absolute immunity. they re aware if they talk about one state, there s already things going on in other states right now where the court wants to resolve it. but this doesn t get on the right foot to suggest that anything other than the law, which might actually turn out in trump s favor in this instance, would be the guiding post. ....