Heat Seeking Device News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

welcome to our viewers this thursday morning. i'm christine romans. donald trump giving us a review of what his 2024 campaign will look like and sound like. the 45th president and republican frontrunner for the white house taking questions last night from gop primary voters at a town hall. trump wasted little time in airing his same old grieveness as. he repeated a core lie to kaitlan collins that he won the 2020 election. >> polls show that you were dominating the republican race but also under active federal investigation for trying to overturn the 2020 election results. your first...

Problems, to today's problems. and i think if you look at a number of cases where the court has applied what might be labeled by some as originalism, you'll see, for example, in kilo, the search of a home with a heat seeking device, the court looked back to find out, would that be considered an unreasonable search? the technology didn't exist, of course. but would something like that have been considered an illegal search? it's essentially equivalent to a peeping tom. of course that would have been considered an illegal search by the government. a heat seeking device, thermal imaging, is also ...

Persons. that's part of my judicial oath. >> so do you see it as your textualism, would you-p apply i to these as well. >> senator, what i'm trying to say is everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. >> i'm just trying to figure out this, because i think for some things a lots of people who subscribe to this theory they say we can have originalism for some cases but not others and seems to me when you look at some opinions that use originalism that you have and some don't, but -- >> well senator -- if i might just respond to that. >> uh-huh. >> i would ask you to take a look at jones again. ki...

Persons. that's part of my judicial oath. >> so do you see it as your textualism, the original public meaning then, would you apply it to these other contexts as well that i just mentioned. >> senator what i'm trying to say to you is i don't take account of the person before me. everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. >> okay. i'm just trying to figure out this. because i think for some thing a lot of people who subscribe to this theory they say we can have originalism for some cases and not others. i call it leg issive originalism. it seems to me when you look at some of the opinions that u...

Persons. that's partial of my judicial oath. >> so do you see it as your textualism, the original meaning, that you would apply it to the other contexts that i mentioned? >> senator, i don't take account of the person before me. everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. >> okay. i'm trying to figure this out. for some things, a lot of people that subscribe to this theory, they say it, well, we can have originalism for some cases, but not for others. i call it selective originalism. it seems to me when you look at some of the opinions that use originalism that you have and some don't. i have on...