Under Buckley News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Windylea's Kip O’Neill speaks speak highly of the New York program, which he described as one size fits all.

Persons. that's part of my judicial oath. >> so do you see it as your textualism, would you-p apply i to these as well. >> senator, what i'm trying to say is everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. >> i'm just trying to figure out this, because i think for some things a lots of people who subscribe to this theory they say we can have originalism for some cases but not others and seems to me when you look at some opinions that use originalism that you have and some don't, but -- >> well senator -- if i might just respond to that. >> uh-huh. >> i would ask you to take a look at jones again. ki...

>> but a as supreme court if you were to make this to overturn chevron would you consider the implications on all the cases in the u.s. and the uncertainty it would create. >> goodness, senator? yes. >> is this what you mean when you talk about maybe it's time to face the behemoth. >> when i see a problem, i tell my bosses about it like any good employee, an my job is listen look at some of the real world implications of what we're doing here. >> but be the boss if you were the supreme court justice and what rule do you think should replace it? should we have de novo review? is that better? >>...

As inform bid the original understanding at the time it was adopted. do you share the view of the democratic attacks that originalism is somehow a quaint outdated notion of reading the constitution for what it says? >> senator, i want to say a few things about that, and i appreciate the opportunity. the first is that sometimes we in our discourse today our civil discourse use labels as a way to not engage with other people, to treat and divide us and them. and as a judge i just don't think that's a very fair, or appropriate, or useful way to engage in discourse. so i'm worried about using labe...

Endure, and that it's a lot bigger than any of us and live hopefully a great deal longer than any of us, our children's children. i do think it's important to try to understand law according to its original understanding. >> so you don't agree with mccullick adapting to the crisis of human affairs. >> no, senator. >> so you do agree. >> well. >> i just want a yes or no, that's all. >> these are complicated issues that take more than a yes or no respectfully and what i would say is the constitution doesn't change. the world around us changes. we have to understand the constitution and apply it ...