Page 25 - Heller Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Shooting ranges outside the state or to second homes. they lost in the lower courts. they appealed to the supreme court, the supreme court took the case and then the city repealed the ordinance and the state passed a law saying no other city could do the same thing. so the law is off the books. so the only question here was, was there still enough to fight about over the second amendment? and the answer seems to be "no." at least, i don't see five votes among the conservatives to say, yes, we should still take this case and make it a major test of the second amendment outside the home. now, th...

This case was moot, whether the challengers could still face penalties from the city, for example, when they're going to a shooting range in new jersey, if they stop for coffee or the bathroom or to get gasoline, would that be an interpretation in the trip? and the lawyer says "no." and we won't penalized anyone for past violations of this statute. it does seem there's not enough to fight here. there's still some strong believers in the second amendment, samuel alito, sam gorsuch, who probably want to reach the merits. but curiously, brett kavanaugh said absolutely nothing today. it didn't see...

Which is that president trump has been talking about this debunked claim that ukraine hacked into -- that ukraine helped get democrats elected, that the ukraine was after him. he said in white house meeting after meeting that ukraine tried to take him down. so senator kennedy is really echoing the paranoia and the fear of president trump. but what we see is that the intelligence community fwh, including the trump administration's own community and agencies, they say this was all russia. and fiona hill, the national security counsel aide who testified before congress publicly said that this is ...

Surround fired from those weapons when it hits your body expends all its kinetic energy destroying everything inside. and i've met those who survived fire from ak-47. i've met those who lost a family member. that belongs on the battlefield and does not belong in this country. so when it comes to those weapons, chris, the answer is yes. but when it comes to firearms used for hunting or self-defense the answer is no. and i don't want you or anyone else to get into the fear mongering that have fallen prey to saying the government is going to come and take all of your guns. what we are talking uab...

I don't think you can do it legally. the heller case makes it pretty clear there's an individual right to own. i don't think we've ever seen the u.s. government do a taking of private property like you're suggesting. i'm not fear mongering, i'm repeating what you're saying. >> so you listen to a justice like antonin scalia, not the most liberal justice who served on the supreme court, and even he found that there is no absolute guarantee under the second amendment and that the government does have a power to regulate those kinds of weapons that are extraordinarily unusual or deadly. and an a.r...