Page 34 - Heller Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Isn't that enough for the people in the united states? do they need a bazooka? >> so jason, did ted cruz have a point here in challenging the constitutionality of the bill? >> no. ted cruz was texas's solicitor general and argued before the supreme court nine times and he knows better than this. if many 2008 the heller decision said that you can't ban handguns because they are in common use and you use them for self-defense and you can ban others like senator feinstein's bazooka and ted cruz is a jerk, and that is why we sent him to washington. >> and you have senator joe manchin who is a key ...

Individual right and protects only or only dealt with the protection of a handgun inside the home. and in fact, the court said that nothing in the case, and this is almost a direct quote. nothing in the case calls into question longstanding prohibitions that had been in place and one of the prohibitions that the court cited, a majority opinion, was concealed weapons and i think the likely ability of states to have very strict regulations or even prohibitions on concealed weapons is likely to be upheld by the supreme court. >> megyn: jordan, i credit julian, he got the u.s. court's heller decis...

Issue. what do you make of that? >> i think this is clearly an nra mole. this is what we've clearly seen after newtown is the nra is losing the argument, both the constitutional argument and the argument about the effectiveness of these laws and has become good at one thing, which is disrespecting the families of the victims, as they did the newtown hearing, disrespecting the office of the president of the united states as they did going after the president's family, disrespecting the office of the vice president by planteding moles to ask these kinds of questions during an interview of the vi...

Political partisans. number one, it would have done zero to prevent the crime in newtown. number two, many of the provisions are contrary to the constitutional protection of the second amendment. but number three, they don't work. >> i think those of us in the pro gun safety movement should accept the heller decision and say there is a constitutional right to bear arms and no less important than the right to free speech. just on the first amendment, we say you can't scream fire in a crowded theater falsely, we have anti-pornography laws, we have anti-libel laws, there are reasonable limitation...

Talk about smoking when it comes to lung cancer. it just doesn't make any sense. it's part of the problem. and we have to deal with it. now i agree with ted. there's a right to bear arms. i want to see that lady if she wants to have a firearm in her house have it. and i think those of us in the pro gun safety movement should accept the heller decision and say there's a constitutional right to bear arms. and it's no less important than the right to free speech, the right against search and seizure. but heller also said that there should be reasonable li limitations. i don't think that lady need...