Stay updated with breaking news from Hoaxed. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
That he is innocent, so i think that we should take a step back, let s see sean: totally agree. it does not look good for him, i will tell you that. dan, we will get to in a second. joining us from chicago is ray, i fired him last night, but apparently you are taking heat for doing a news report on my show in chicago, gee, i am sorry. but you have been great on the show. i really appreciate you having me on, thank you, sean. sean: i do apologize for mispronouncing your name, but now i will do it on purpose. it was good tv, but as you said, it does not look good for jussie smollett, chicago police are accusing him publicly of making the entire thing up, and it looks like we can now start to use the word that police asked us not to use before, and that is hoaxed, smollett s legal team met for several hours at ty courthouse trying to work some ....
A few possibilities here. it is always possible the times is getting hoaxed, right? not at all likely but possible. halloween comes early, boo, the cold bony fingers of insanity and authoritarianism to grab your ankle when your foot drops off the bed, ha harkes it s a hoax. also possible the times is getting played by the white house.also possible the times getting played by the white house. maybe this is a white house endorsed effort to make the president seem so besieged from withinton justifies extreme action by the president to clean house and fire lots and lots of people without too much scrutiny on any one of those firings. there s no reason to think either of those things is what happened and no reason to think the times would have done anything other than their best due diligence on this in terms ....
Of figuring out the origins on this and not getting played or getting hoaxed. there s every reason to think it is what it appears to be. if it is what it appears to be, if this is a real senior administration official that feels the need to sound this alarm about what is wrong with the serving president, why are they making this public case now and what exactly are they trying to get us the public to do about it? you can snipe these sort of comments in gossip. you can make these sort of plans and plots among your fellow co-conspirators in the white house if you re actively working to sabotage the president s worst impulses and thwart him from the worst things he wants to do to the country. you can do that you will without signaling to the public, hey, op-ed, new york times, you need to know this is happening. why signal to the public? what are they asking of the ....
A few possibilities here. it is always possible the times is getting hoaxed, right? halloween comes early, boo, the cold fingers of inantism your foot droops off the bed, ah-ha, a hoax. also possible the times is getting played by the white house. maybe this is a white house endorsed effort to make the president seem so besieged from within it justice extreme action by the president to clean house and fire lots and lots of people without too much scrutiny on any one of those firings. there s no reason to think either of those things is what happened and no reason to think the times would have done their due diligence on this and not getting played or hoaxed. there s every reason to think it ....