This from like the ivory towers of your law school but it makes actual people in this country when the president calls you dont get to interrupt me on this time. And when you suggest that you invoke the president s son name here and try to make a joke at referencing baron trump that does not lend credibility to your argument, it makes you look mean and attacking someones family. The minor child of the president of the United States. So lets see if we could get into the facts. To all of the witnesses. If you have personal knowledge of a single Material Fact in the schiff report, please raise your hand. And let the record reflect no personal knowledge of a single fact. And you know what, that continues on the tradition we saw from adam schiff where ambassador taylor could not identify an Impeachment Offense and mr. Kent never met with the president and fiona hill never mentioned military aid and mr. Hill was not aware of any
nefarious aid and Colonel Vindman said that bribery was invoked
And conservatives dont want to be around each other and so they have to spread out, you may not see this from like the ivory towers of your law school, but it makes the actual people in this country when the president calls you dont get to interrupt me on this time. Let me also suggest that when you invoke the president s sons name here. When you try to make a little joke out of referencing trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument. It makes you look mean. It makes you look like youre attacking someones family. The minor child of the president of the United States. So lets see if we can get into the facts, to all of the witnesses. If you have personal knowledge of a single Material Fact in the schiff report, please raise your hand. And let the record reflect no personal knowledge of a single fact. And you know what . That continues on the tradition that we saw from adam schiff where ambassador taylor could not identify an Impeachable Offense. Mr. Kent never met with the
pr
if this committee and this house fail to act, then you re sending a message to this president and to future presidents that it is no longer a problem if they abuse their power. it is no longer a problem if they invite other countries to interfere in our elections and no longer a probe if they put the interest of other countries ahead of ours. professor karlan. i agree with professor feldman and i apologize for getting over heated over a moment ago but i have a constitutional right under the first amendment to give money to candidates and we have a constitutional duty from foreigners spending money in our elections and these are two sides of the same coin. thank you. and with that i yield back. the gentleman yields back. mr. johnson. thank you. i was struck this morning by the same thing as all of my friends and colleagues on this side of the room. chairman nadler actually began this morning with the outrageous statement that the facts before us are undisputed. of course, ev
power of the president s office? if this committee and this house fail to act, you re sending a message to this president and to future presidents that it s no longer a problem if they abuse their power. it s no longer a problem if they invite other countries to interfere in elections and put their interests ahead of ours. professor karlan? i agree with professor feldman. i apologize for getting overheated a moment ago. i have a constitutional right under the first amendment to give money to candidates. at the same time, we have a constitutional duty to keep foreigners from spending money in our elections. those two things are two sides of the same coin. thank you. with that i yield back. the gentleman yields back. mr. johnson? thank you. i was struck this morning by the same thing as all of my friends and colleagues. chairman nadler began with the outrageous statement that the facts before us are indisputed. of course, everyone knows that that is not true.
the confidence that we have to have in the president to not abuse the power of his office? if this committee and this house fail to act, then you are sending a message to this president and to future presidents that it s no longer a problem if they abuse their power. it s no longer a problem if they invite other countries to interfere in our elections. it s no longer a problem if they put the interest of other countries ahead of ours. i agree with professorfeld man. i should say just one thing and i apologize for getting a little overheated a moment ago. but i have a constitutional right under the first amendment to give money to candidates. at the same time, we have a constitutional duty to keep foreigners from spending money in our elections. and those two things are two sides of the same coin. thank you. and with that i yield back. mr. johnson. thank you. i was struck this morning by the same thing as all my friends and colleagues on this side of the room. chairman nadler