Human Twitter News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

ex-president very clear publicly known efforts and plot to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election. a series of court battles over the last few weeks have largely gone in special counsel jack smith's favor, resulted if a whole slew of new trump officials and allies now being ordered to testify. some big names, none of them bigger than the one, vice president mike pence, news broke on tuesday that a federal judge had ordered him to answer questions under oath regarding conversations that may involve illegality on donald trump's part. here's what mike pence told nbc news about all of ...

the tellers agree that the total number of votes cast is 434 of which the honorable hakeem jeffries of the state of new york has received 212. [ cheers and applause ] >> the honorable kevin mccarthy of the state of california has received 203. [ cheers and applause ]. >> the honorable jim jordan of the state of ohio has received 19. no person having received the majority of the whole number of votes cast by surname, a speaker has not been elected. for what purpose does the gentleman from louisiana rise? >> madam clerk, i rise to nominate kevin mccarthy for the position of speaker of ...

Were doing. >> miles, it seems like one of the pieces that legal analysts thought needed to be sort of a loop that needed to be closed or part of the case against trump in terms of the criminality that the congressional probe was able to establish and prove was his state of mind and his intent. it seems like this last list of witnesses, meadows, robert o'brien his national security adviser, stephen miller, dan scavino, sort of his human twitter fingers, these are the closest people to him. these people are his state of mind. >> nicolle you're absolutely right about that. you know, look, put ja...

Were like that where everybody spoke like that. >> it's human twitter. >> human twitter. >> you should see how they communicate. >> they don't communicate. >> he check out their phones. tina, did you think if you had children under 18 -- >> do you think they are watching and laughing now? >> no, they are not laughing. do you have a right to see what they are saying on their iphones. >> no. >> what? >> it's not their iphone! you're paying for it! >> they are 16 years old. >> first of all, do you actually want to read that? >> oh, yeah. >> no, you don't. >> when you're 16, you do! >> you're here...