hi, everyone. happy friday. it is 4:00 in the east on an interesting and important day of breaking news including a pair of decisions from the supreme court, and one for the massive implication of the very ability of our government to function, and another one throwing a wrench in efforts to hold the january 6th insurrections legally accountable. both of the rulings held by the nation s highest court and that court is dominated by a 6-3 right wing super majority. and all of those underscoring the massive and historic and tectonic undeniable prestigious political cycle. last night at the presidential debate, donald trump went unchecked as he blustered for 90 minutes. and there was deep anxiety and bordering on deep panic and kweps of what the biden campaign does to steady all of the angst. after an evening of torrent of lies raised by trump and the two mod rays or the was overshadowed by the performance of president joe biden. earlier today, president biden seeming to understa
preordained. it was not imminent, it was not necessarily in motion after the smoke cleared at the u.s. capital on january 6th. and as nancy pelosi testified, the pooh-pooh was cleaned up. but the work of the congressional committee i think history will have to judge exactly what role it played in putting some of the eyewitnesss to trump s role in inciing the violence and cheering the coup and pressuring mike pence exactly what role that congressional investigation played. but this thing that feels imminent, that feels unavoidable even to trump and his legal team was very much an open question in the hours and days after january 6th. yeah, you know, speaking with members of the january 6th committee, which i ve been doing over the past week, you know, they ve been very careful not to look like they re putting a political thumb on the scale in any way doing this. but they do feel like their investigation laid out a road map for the justice department
notification it will disappear for good. so we don t know what its fate. jessica, i want you to respond to an argument i keep seeing more and more from republicans and conservatives, which basically the tech compaies are now going to be the arbiter in terms of what is fair and foul in terms of speed. one day it s white supremacist, and the next thing you know it s going to be all conservatives. yeah, chris, this is a red herring. look, it s not hard to know who is a white supremacist. we look on twitter, david duke, former grand wizard of the klu klux klan is on twitter. get that guy out of here. right. it s not that hard. there is a difference between white people and white supremacist. the line is very clear. folks who are adversarying or inciing violence against historically oppressed groups don t deserve a platform. they don t deserve amplification. they have a right to free speech but they don t deserve for the companies to be amplifying them.