Including Obstructing Congress News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

were convicted today of seditious conspiracy. it's a rarely used, often difficult to prove charge. a fifth member was acquitted of seditious conspiracy, but he has been convicted on other very serious charges, including obstruction of an official proceeding and assaulting an officer. but today's verdict means so far 14 people, including members of another far right group, the oath keepers, have either pleaded guilty or been found guilty of conspireing and plotting a violent overthrow of the united states government. this victory by the justice department, while it is a milestone and ...

Who believe that the supreme court should have the same ethicals standards as everyone else and congress can act. i don't see any other way. the supreme court will not do it themselves. i hoped maybe john roberts would speak on this. he chose not to. that's the only avenue here. >> barbara, let me show you what kim is talking about. here is john cornyn making exactly that point. >> i know harlan crow and clarence thomas. they are both honorable men. this is part of a 32-year smear campaign that started with his confirmation hearing. i played the video for people who don't remember it. he refer...

Hearing this week was this public education piece. i think the public intuits something is wrong. the public approval rating has plunged farther and faster than any institution in american civic life. the public doesn't understand they don't have the same ethical codes of conducts including other branchs, including federal judges. clarence thomas isn't abiing by what is there. talk about the role of congress or doj in making sure the public understands the basic functions of the court and the people who govern us. >> yeah. one thing that i took away that i think is important from the hearing t...

He is a conservative conservative and originalist who spent his life on the bench. he said, of course, congress has a role here in being able to pass rules that enforce -- have enforceable ethics rules on the supreme court. the same way we have nine supreme court justices is because congress said so. the same reason the supreme court meets when it does is because congress says so. this idea that congress, because of separation of powers, cannot enforce this is -- doesn't seem to hold water with me, constitutionally. the problem is the political will. there's no political will in congress right...