Program to what extent it is a threat or not to its neighbors what might reasonably be expected in way of any kind of follow agreement perhaps any agreement is not feasible at this time. And so we have assembled quite a panel and im going to briefly introduce them and turn over the moderateing responsibilities to my director at the south asia center he in addition to directing our south asia center, of course, our iran program is part of the south asia center. He is a true rocket scientist. He managed the program in arms control disarmament in International Security at the university of illinois at champagne overu saw developing projects on south Asian Security issue ors. Hes also worked with Cornell University and he is a true rocket scientist. He had ph. D. With a specialization numerical accusics i dont know what that is. Buts thats brought and then we have a terrific panel. The go to men in washington on all things missiles mike senior fellow for missile selfdefense at the internat
Agreement. They dont square up how do you those statements were very clear clear. First of all, the aim is not to go to military sites. Its not us. Its iaea, of course. The aim is to go to where there is suspicious or suspicion of nuclear relevant activities. If they are in a military site, doesnt matter. They are still the iaea access to those sites. I only have a few seconds left. I would hope that you would reconcile those statements for the public. Youve stated the 24day waiting period for International Inspectors wont allow the regime to conceal any illegal activity, but as i read the agreement and many other people have pointed out to the inspectors request to visit those sites could be delayed much longer than 24 days. I know that youre not concerned about the 24day period. Do you believe that we would that iaea would be able to handle that . But if you look at different parts in section q of the agreement, i think we have the potential that were looking at an 89day delay. You t