Isabelt John News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Chunks of that money came from. with helps from hundreds of volunteers poring over pages and pages of filings, "the huffington post's" christina wilkie turned up evidence that some of the president's donors were recorded incorrectly or may have even tried to hide their identities. now thanks to wilkie and her crowd sourced reporting, the president's inaugural committee is admitting its financial report was riddled with errors. vowing to correct the many faulty donor records. they even resolved the case of one isabel t. john who gave a reported $400,000 to the inaugural committee and who does n...

But when a reporter for "the huffington post" started digging into some of the less recognizable names on the list, she noted something very strange. they did not seem to exist. there were no public records, for example, related to one isabel t john, who is listed as having donated $400,000, which is a lot of money, to the inaugural committee. the address listed for isabel t. john is an empty lot in new jersey, where electronics company lg just broke ground on its future north american headquarters. with dozens more examples like that, one reporter, christina will ki, enlisted hundreds of onli...

It really is the donor has an obligation to report themselves accurately. so if you're looking for deception, arguably it would be on the side of some of these -- you know, of these no-name, shell llcs. but there's also a responsibility on the part of the committee, especially when they're taking enormous donations like this isabel t. john, this $400,000. for them to verify who this money is coming from so that they report it correctly by the law. >> yeah. >> so, yeah, all we know is that rodriguez lives in a seedy part of singapore, and that's it. >> all right. well, that's a good tease for a...

Rig easy, another25,000 from singapore. says u.s. citizenship verified but the listed address doesn't seem to exist. again, is that a -- i mean the question in all this stuff and partly because some of this stuff is shown to be errors, is it error or deception? that is sort of the core question to me. >> right. it really is the donor has an obligation to report themselves accurately. so if you're looking for deception, arguably it would be on the side of some of these -- you know, of these no-name, shell llcs. but there's also a responsibility on the part of the committee, especially when they...

Inauguration. where did all the money come from? we started to get answers last week when the inaugural committee released its required filings with the federal election commission. now, the largest single donation at $5 million was from sheldon aidleson. $250,000 from billionaire kelsey warren, whose company is building the dakota access pipeline. a half million, perhaps somewhat surprisingly from citgo petroleum. but when a reporter for "the huffington post" started digging into some of the less recognizable names on the list, she noted something very strange. they did not seem to exist. the...