Stay updated with breaking news from Itch colvin. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
he can express any views he was. wants. the big mistake was not recusing himself. when he tweeted he would make sure trump doesn t become president and has an insurance policy, he could not be fair and just. by not recusing himself, he violated his position of trust. i would not go too far and blame it on the top authorities of the fbi. they didn t know. when they did know, they demoted him and took him out of the investigation. i think it s a blemish, but i don t think it s a fatal flaw in the investigation. i think there are deeper and more fatal flaws. ultimately i think it was the right decision. tucker: don t those texts suggest why he didn t recuse himself? it s one thing to express a political opinion. do i it for a leaving. living. he was suggesting that his opinions would drive the crimmial investigation that he was conducting. that s subversion of justice. that s the issue. he denied under oath that in any way he was influenced by his hatred for thump in any ....
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. professional intelligence officer rather than saying this on msnbc or writing it in the press, he might ve gone straight to the special counsel and explained what his concerns were. but the problem is that it s not just our own citizens who are listening john brennan, there are foreign governments and spies feelings stealing secrets on our behalf who are going to believe that john brennan and something that we don t earn their trust in our government is going to be degraded, our national security will be impacted negatively. the second point i would make quickly is that those who signed this letter might question whether they want to be tethered to john brennan, who is really the weak link in this chain here. he s not a credible witness. i think that those who are concerned about a security clearance issue and maybe feel like the ....
A recap of the day s headlines and a look at what s in store for tomorrow. all tried to convince her to look at the paper trail, we laid it out in front of her again and again and she still said she had reasonable doubt and that is the way the jury worked. we didn t want it to be hung so we tried for an extended period of time to convince her that in the end she held out and that is why we have 10 counts. is that where the note did not come from, performance in the note and said can you explain reasonable doubt? wasn t connected to that? it was. most of us did not want that question out there but one of the jurors did. we felt a little foolish sending it but that is the way the jury works. deliberation requires we submit that question to the judge. judge ellis said this about the situation. i received criticism and threats. i can imagine they would too meaning of your names were released. if you told jurors their names would be public at the outset of this trial i mi ....
A recap of the day s headlines and a look at what s in store for tomorrow. cohen, the manafort ruling, and the president s reaction. a lot happening tonight. democrats pushing talk of impeachment, but president trump is fighting back. tweeting that the only thing he did wrong was when an election that hillary clinton was supposed to emerge victorious i in. in an exclusive interview with fox & friends ainsley earhardt, the president lashing out at michael cohen. the president had said publicly paid stormy daniels because he wanted to go straight it was false in the waning days of the campaign and the president is getting backup from liberal law professor alan dershowitz who told bret baier that the pundits claiming the president is an unindicted coconspirator are wrong as a matter of basic criminal law. it would not be a crime for the president to contribute money to his own campaign in the form of money to stormy daniels or anyone else. even as democrats about their attack ....
A newscast reviewing and analyzing top stories of the day as they happen. did you find him to be credible? no. i think he would have done anything that he could to preserve himself. that s just obvious in the fact that he flipped on manafort. shepard: but that juror went on to convict paul manafort. peter doocy will have more on that in just a moment and john roberts will have a detailed wrap-up on a renewed throw down between the attorney general jeff sessions and the president. first, let s get to rick leventhal with more on the reported immunity deal for the publisher of the national inquirer and now former trump friend david pecker. former friend. sources are confirming this wall street journal report that the u.s. attorney s office offered immunity to david pecker so that he would talk about what he knew about michael cohen s handling of those payments to those women, david pecker, long-time friend of the president and runs the national inquirer. the journal rep ....