Iti Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> as you say, there are implications of invoking the fifth amendment. the fifth amendment is a right that protect us against self-incrimination. in the context of an open investigation like this, those questions you raise about what it means he is invoking his fifth amendment rights is a pretty pointed question. bluntly, does this decision imply that jeff clark and his attorneys believe there was some kind of criminal activity committed by the president or people around him, mr. clark, on the matters that you want to question him about? >> well, it could very well mean that. obviously, he is ...

Like as anodyne terms as possible, characterizing that prospect as the court simply becoming neutral on the issue of abortion, no longer playing a role on the issue, by which he d means states will now be free to make abortion a crime.chic this is brett kavg kav gnaw. it's brett kavanaugh's voice you will hear first and the lawyer who answers him here is julie rikelman who is arguing on abortion rights, arguing on behalf of the center for reproductive rights. >> i think the other side wouldh n say that the core problem here is that the court has been forced by the position you're taking and by...

Of abortion, and they would say, therefore, it should be left to the people, to the states, or to congress. and i think they also then continue, because the opco constitution is neutral, that this court should be scrupulously neutral on the ti question of abortion, neither pro-choice nor pro-life, but because, they say, the constitution doesn't give us th, authority, we should leave it to the states and we should be scrupulously neutral on the it question, and that they are saying here, i think, that we e, should return to a position of neutrality on that contentious social issue rather than c...

The question is, did you participate in these illegal activities in the white house. as you know, he recommended a process by which the elections could be manipulated in certain states. well, that's clearly illegal, but we need to hear from him whether or not he said it. we have reason to believe he did. but if he's of the opinion that if i come before the committee and acknowledge that, then i have contributed to the january 6th insurrection in part simply because i made a recommendation that ultimately led states to believe they could overturn the election. look at what went on in arizona. l...

0 federal government. now this man had no experience with refugees, no experience with resettlement, and for sure he's perfect. it is the office of refugee resettlement, he has no experience with either of those words are concepts although i'm sure he did know his way around anknow his although, i'm sure he did know his way around an office. what he did have experience in is that he was a lifelong, hard-core antiabortion, anticontraception activist. and it turns out, we learned, that whether or not your main life experience is being an anti-abortion activist, if, in fact, we get the kind of go...