Page 3 - Jack Daniel Properties News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

In a recent unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held that the test set forth in Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989) (the "Rogers test") does not apply in two situations.

On June 8, the United States Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly decisive ruling on trademark law and its relationship with First Amendment rights. The case has provoked widespread discussion among IP lawyers across the world regarding similar cases in other jurisdictions.

The Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision on June 8 in Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products LLC, __ US __ (2023), a victory for Jack Daniel's in a battle over whether a dog toy...

Can an alleged trademark infringer avoid the likelihood-of-confusion test by claiming its use is an "expressive work"? In Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U. S. __ (2023), the Supreme...

After VIP initially filed suit against Jack Daniel’s seeking declaratory judgment that the product did not infringe on Jack Daniel’s trademarks, Jack Daniel’s brought counterclaims under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement and trademark dilution.