City resources. And it also has the effect of denying these services to everybody in the neighborhood who wants them and there is a Strong Demand for these services. And it will not be installing the cabinet and of course it drives up the cost of the services that are available and because it leaves an effective monopoly on large parts of staoet and accordingly, at t asked that you affirm the departments decision and deny the appeal. Thank you. Thank you. And miss short . Department of public works. We think that the only thing that i would like to rebutte is that the intention of waving the preapplication process if there is no other feasible location. Has to do with technical constraints that will prevent an smf from going else and i think in this case, while we found that this was a perfectly adequate location, the first time around and the type of location that we would thought made sense for the neighborhood, and i think that i dont believe that it is true that there is no other f
Submitted. I guess, and i would like to ask a question of our City Attorney, and i know that this has come up once before. But i wonder if the City Attorney has a position in regard to mr. Johnsons argument that the local ordinance conflicts with the state law. Well, the board of appeals is not a lawmaking body of the city. And we must follow the law of the city and so we are bound to apply to the ordinance and now that it is effective and i dont think that we have a choice in that regard. Okay. I guess that i would be inclined to follow the same procedure that we followed before. For the sake of consistency which is that we are waiting for dpw to issue the guidance and we believe that the ordinance applies retroactively to this case. And we would have to continue it in order for dpw to issue its guidance and we can provaoed from there and i dont know in that guidance will require starting again, it would seem so, given that there are additional requirements in the ordinance that dont
Has come up once before. But i wonder if the City Attorney has a position in regard to mr. Johnsons argument that the local ordinance conflicts with the state law. Well, the board of appeals is not a lawmaking body of the city. And we must follow the law of the city and so we are bound to apply to the ordinance and now that it is effective and i dont think that we have a choice in that regard. Okay. I guess that i would be inclined to follow the same procedure that we followed before. For the sake of consistency which is that we are waiting for dpw to issue the guidance and we believe that the ordinance applies retroactively to this case. And we would have to continue it in order for dpw to issue its guidance and we can provaoed from there and i dont know in that guidance will require starting again, it would seem so, given that there are additional requirements in the ordinance that dont exist in the prior, and i dont agree that it is predetermined that dpw would grant this permit, un
Thats it. Thank you thank you. Next speaker good afternoon i live in the panic can im the secretary for the Golf Alliance and im a lawyer i met my husband through the alliance i guessed thats a good thing. Do you see much of him and yeah. Im a latino and ive been a litigation attorney golf is a passion and im here to tell you as past code champ that this is not just a golf course its a truly a place where the Community Meets and young people are out there enjoying that golf course. You get young people away from their ipods and games have them walk in the beautiful course maybe theyll become loyal to protecting the environment. As std we play and protect we have an understanding of how important the balance is. Ive golfed with the folks here in mexico and ive seen the balance that can be struck between golfers and the project. Lets get this thing started and keep people out there. Its too good of o a resource for everyone its a great resource for affordable golf can we please hold than
Populations. Weve been doing that by, you know, producing courses that engage atrisk students, students that are atrisk before they even start school by attracting immigrants to take our courses. And weve been doing a really, really good job. We serve latin american latino studies serves around 20,000 students at city college. The diversity departments probably serve the students of color which probably represent 60 to 70 of the entire population of city college. So, this attack is forgetting the fact that the majority of the small departments are base their curriculum on grass root connectionses with the students. None of the small departments have received anything over the last 30 years for free. We fought for every single class that we teach. And its not a fight where we receive money from the district to allow us to teach. Its fights that come from the bottom up. The Department Chair structure is exactly well suited for that kind of environment where we have a little bit more inpu