July 25th Call Transcript News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Somalia. As if this is another step by the president to intimidate witnesses. He did not intimidate to you. You are here. You have endured. There are other people out there that can expect this before treatment if they come forward. That is a question for us. You also indicated that the president has a prerogative to appoint a noncareer person, and to be candid, republican president s and democratic president s have done that. Mr. Sondlands transcript is out, and he was someone who indicated that everything hinged, the white house meeting and the release of the vital defensive aid, everything ...

Obligation to account fully for my role in these events. Did by obligation, you mean simply your legal obligation . Or did you mean something bigger . Well, both my legal obligation and my moral obligation. Your moral obligation . I actually want to present an alternative theory. Your family came here escaping the holocaust via uruguay. And your parents moved lucy and later you here where, frankly, youve been an american success story. Through dent of hard work and innovation, good idea, and knack to hire the right people and some luck, youve built a considerable successful business. One that ...

On those issues of importance to potus and to the united states. hopefully, that will break the log jam. and secretary pompeo's reply, yes, not what issues of importance to the potus. not what are you talking about, ambassador sondland? because secretary pompeo was on the july 25th phone call. he knew what issues were important to potus and there were two of them. the investigation into 2016 and the dnc server and the investigation into the bidens. by the end of august, you testified, my belief was that if ukraine did something to demonstrate a serious intention to fight corruption, specifical...

You know, on october 14th, rudy giuliani told "the washington post" that sondland quote, seemed to be in charge closed quote of the effort to get ukrainian officials to publish -- or to publicly announce investigations. of course, that's false, correct? >> if i had been in charge, i would have asked president trump to have the meeting without preconditions and the meeting would have occurred a long time ago. >> that's exactly right. the president is the one that wanted these investigations, as we learn later on in -- in reading the july 25th call transcript, isn't that right? >> the president,...

Of who the u.s. ambassador was. >> bret: as republicans gather around the microphone, you can see jim jordan, let's take a listen. >> a third witness who has no first-hand knowledge of the assessment that is supposed to be the focus of the entire inquiry. the third witness who never talk to the president part of the third witness who never talked with chief of staff, the third witness who was not on the call, third witness who is not even as i said in ukraine when the relevant, during the relevant time frame. was not even there when president zelinski left. so four facts. i say this every time...