Page 4 - Kupperman Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Or hunter biden in that room. if donald trump could have the bidens come in in addition to the whistle-blower, he would like to have that trial go on for many months. and they are going to have that trial in their television advertising, their digital advertising, on the debate stage if donald trump participates, at the convention. we are going to be hearing about burisma from the stage if joe biden's the nominee. so, there's ways in which trump would like a long trial, if he could have the trial that he was in charge of. but, of course that is not actually how it works. >> phil rucker, you me...

The house democrats should've waited for these court cases to come from fruition to be completed because now you are going to have the president's tax returns, you are going to impeach him next week. you really only have one chance to impeach the president. they can't impeach hem again in june if they found out that he's paid no taxes. we have no idea what they are going to find out here. this is going to reignite that. and i just -- number three, the white house has argued that congress doesn't need these records because there is no specific legislative purpose for congress to have these reco...

Publicly, a very weak case, why do they want no witnesses? why are they so afraid of the public servants that came forward and have already essentially spoken to the country and for which donald trump, if he wants due process, is perfectly prepared to respond to their charges, to respond to the facts that they have put on the table? it's a striking thing to say we are going to try to bury this. >> all right. no one's going anywhere. we need them all too much. after the break, is mitch mcconnell throwing those senate republicans under the bus by announcing on national television that the result...

Outside the supreme court by msnbc news justice correspondent pete williams. it seems like this is another branch of government who is expected to rule and potentially put itself in the middle of a consequential decision about the authority of congress in june, just weeks before the next presidential election. >> so the court agreed to take three cases, the three appeals that the president had filed here or his lawyers had filed here in the supreme court. the first one is an appeal from lower court rulings that said that a grand jury run by the d.a. in new york, cyrus vance could get records f...

To be tweeting about it around the clock. just your thoughts from watching this court. have you ever seen a dynamic like that shape up? >> well, we saw justice gorsuch on the court involved in some of these privileged cases involving the presidential powers. remember, in the 1970s when the supreme court said president nixon was not immune from a subpoena for the white house tapes, william renquist did sit the case out. but other members of the court did vote on that case. i wouldn't think that any of the current justices would recuse themselves. renquist had worked in the justice department. t...