Lander Information News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Despicable demonstratesing a god who belongs in history, so i agree with the privilege and also revoking the privilege when its been abused so in john brennan's case i think it's appropriate and with respect to some of the other people under consideration, i will tell you, maria, i think that it's entirely appropriate when someone at the department of justice or the fbi or in our intelligence community is under investigation or has been criminally referred or fired or demoted because of misconduct that you revoke their security clearances. why would you give them access to national security in...

That uranium one decision and of course she hires this cut-out fusion gps who was using supposedly russia intelligence sources to lander information into the fbi and doj. think about this maria. peter strzok whose investigating hillary clinton's e-mail abuses at the same time is working with hillary clinton's campaign apparatus to try to take out president trump, or then candidate trump. outrageous conflict and mueller is conflicted himself because he's using all of this material created by strzok by ohr, by steele, by the clinton dnc dossier. we haven't even gotten into the spygate where the ...

For purposes of this investigation is the white house counsel, not mcgahn. he basically is recused from that because he was a witness which is fine and i think the president has to decide that. you and i can have feelings about it but the fact is we know enough about it now to know that crimes were committed, perjury, if there was any collusion with the russians they're the one who did it and there's evidence of it. maria: well what about that? does robert mueller need to see the dnc server? where is the server? how is robert mueller going to get his hands-on all of the information pertaining ...

To question the president. right now, we're going back and forth with letters to try to set out ground rules. we wrote them a letter a week and a half ago they haven't responded yet which tells me they're not in a rush and someone just asks me well are you delaying? hardly in comparison to the special counsel. we've been going since june and we responded in two, three days, four days they responded in two weeks, and these are all-important things to whether you can do an interview or not particularly in light of the fact that they already have all of the information they're going to ask us abo...