Vimarsana
Biggest News Aggregation in the World

Page 10 - Law Developments News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Law Developments. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Law Developments Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Registering people's names as trademarks - Vimarsana News

Registering people's names as trademarks

Section 3(h) of the Law on Trademarks (22,362) prohibits the registration of a person's name, pseudonym or portrait as a trademark without either their consent or that of their heirs up to the fourth degree. Cuba Ron SA applied to register the trademark ARECHABALA under Class 33 in Argentina. Maria Catalina Arechabala Arechabala opposed the registration, arguing a lack of legitimate interest on the part of the applicant and the grounds of Section 3(h) of the Law on Trademarks. The controversy in Argentina originated in the aftermath of the Cuban Revolution in 1959, when the main rum-manufactu...

New rules on remuneration for employees' inventions, utility models and industrial designs - Vimarsana News

New rules on remuneration for employees' inventions, utility models and industrial designs

Creation of inventions, utility models or industrial designs For inventions, the amount of remuneration must be 30% of the employee's average monthly wage over the previous 12 months. For models or designs, the amount of remuneration must be 20% of the employee's average monthly wage over the previous 12 months. Payment must be made within two months of the patent grant or the employer's decision to keep the information secret. If the patent was not granted because of circumstances under the employer's control, payment must be made within 18 months of the filing date. Employers' use of employ...

Clarification on scope and meaning of Cayman firewall legislation and forum for administration clauses - Vimarsana News

Clarification on scope and meaning of Cayman firewall legislation and forum for administration clauses

forum non conveniens applied. Forum for administration clause Kawaley J agreed that the nature or legal character of the dispute is relevant (applying the decision of Crociani v Crociani (7)) in deciding whether a jurisdiction clause in a trust deed applies: The question of whether a forum for administration clause, irrespective of whether it is expressed to be exclusive or not, confers exclusive jurisdiction on the relevant court is an arid debate if the context in which the question arises is not taken into account. The court found that, on the facts of the present case, the trustee would ...

The 2021 ICC Arbitration Rules – what revised joinder and consolidation rules mean for construction disputes - Vimarsana News

The 2021 ICC Arbitration Rules – what revised joinder and consolidation rules mean for construction disputes

What's new in the 2021 ICC rules on joinder and consolidation? The most notable change in the new 2021 International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules, which are applicable to all ICC arbitrations initiated from 1 January 2021, is to make it easier to join an additional party to a pending arbitration. Under Article 7 of the 2017 ICC rules, a request for joinder made after the confirmation or appointment of any arbitrator was subject to the unanimous consent of all parties. However, the new Article 7(5) of the 2021 rules gives the arbitral tribunal the discretion to grant a request f...

Commencing proceedings against a Cayman company in liquidation: having a case worth entertaining - Vimarsana News

Commencing proceedings against a Cayman company in liquidation: having a case worth entertaining

Introduction The Grand Court recently considered the statutory moratorium against commencing proceedings against a Cayman company which has been placed into liquidation. In BDO Cayman Ltd v Ardent Harmony Fund Inc (in Official Liquidation),(1) the Grand Court held that a plaintiff which launches originating proceedings against a company in liquidation, seeking adverse orders against that company, "patently requires leave" of the court to bring the proceedings. The Grand Court also held that the plaintiffs in that case did not have "a case worth entertaining" in respect of either basis on whi...