WHUT Charlie Rose October 8, 2013
More than temporary. That would be a permanent slowing of the growth of the Social Security spending. Rose what do you think of that . Not going happen. Rose why not . First of all t would be desirable if it would but its not going to. Because i think at this point the white house has made it clear that they view thises a repeated game or repeated thing that, you know, every year or so were going to have these kinds of issues. And that if they said they werent going to negotiate and start negotiating what happens next year or the year thereafter or the year thereafter. So i think the way out o...
Source: archive.org