Page 34 - Line Private News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Again, goes through the analysis that they have done and concluded that they have here that theres no significant impact. Substantial evidence you have been told and know from previous appeals is really the linchpin of your decision here. Substantial evidence is facts, reasonable assumptions predicated on facts and Expert Opinions supported by facts. You see the common theme here is there must be facts. What substantial evidence is not is argument, speculations un substantiated opinion or inaccurate or Economic Impacts which do not contribute to to the environment. I would argue that the appel...

Second egress for a new unit that was being created and through the hard work of city planning Historical Preservation she was given such an, egress through the garage and now abandoned it this prevents us again from light, air and repair of our buildings and goes against the very issue that issue that is characteristic. Very wide alleyways between the buildings and that was a characteristic of the building between 1890 and 1915 and while she has claimed she wants to create other aspects of of the development on the roof weve never actually seen what the plans are. The side of the building is ...

Plan the majority of the appellants concerns about inconsistent see with the guidelines specifically to light and air have already been heard by by the Planning Commission. Voted on a 7 to zero vote to approve the project with no modifications. Currently pending with the board of appeals on the issue of the building permit. The fact remains none of these issues raised by the appellants are sequa sequa issues. None of them will result in a Significant Impact to the environment. For the reasons stated at this hearing the Department Finds it complies with the requirements of sequa while the depar...

An, egress through the garage and now abandoned it this prevents us again from light, air and repair of our buildings and goes against the very issue that issue that is characteristic. Very wide alleyways between the buildings and that was a characteristic of the building between 1890 and 1915 and while she has claimed she wants to create other aspects of of the development on the roof weve never actually seen what the plans are. The side of the building is still planned to to be change and theres a permit she had withdrawn but appears to be coming back changing the entry system of the buildin...

That suspension. That will be heard by the board of appeals and quite frankly everything they raised today they are the body to deal with disputes regarding issue issue ance of permits and they have a wide ranging purview of what they can do. When the permit is finally issued by dbi, that permit will also be appealed to the board of appeals and they, too, will make a decision on whateveral allegations the appellants want to raise. You cant lower the height. I know the Settlement Agreement we can argue we can go on and on about that but the bottom line its a private agreement. They are free to ...