Classification unit and the adult probation and others within the system to determine whether we should put someone on electronic monitoring or not. But keep in mind, and this is not uncommon, that it is restrictive in the da and the courts. And why the Cottage Industry is starting to spring back and by rejecting the people and yet, and then the courts and i think that this was just sort of inad ver tant was asking that the people to be put on em and find an em vendor and that they will pay themselves and that they will pay to be put on em after we officially rejected the em. And i think that our Assessment Tool should go out for coffee, and the tool and the public defender will want to come out sxh that they want to sort of commingle we should and there is not a uniform Assessment Tool, that is to form and you should not necessarily be dictated by a one criminal Justice Agency and let the courts decide. And i would like to hear from adult probation, i would have to say that i am rathe
The argument about what we think is appropriate and you can imagine the scenario where the defense attorney will say this person is safe and he will come back to court and you should release him on the promise. And we might be saying we disagree with that and we think that there is danger or a risk of him not determining and the judge makes a determination of multiple things set, bail and release them on the promise to appear and on supervised promise to appear and go through the pretrial and have a case manager and i believe that in the Court Electronic monitoring but it will be at the individuals expense. So you make the argument to support having one to be put on the electronic monitoring. And what assessment do you use . We dont currently have a tool which is what we are trying to develop. And you have made judgments. We have to make judgments we have to make judgments and how you will. Sorry . Has it failed you in determine of the judgments that have you made . Well. The people th
Was really hard on us. So in theory i think that we already have a law in place for this. And so i am kind of saying why we have to add to it. And so i can see that if the people have been in jail for 30 days to 60 days and showing the Good Behavior and the staff are able to assess them, and see that yeah, they are possibly really low risk to the community to recommend that they be released on the electronic monitoring but much would prefer as i said or. And on the deversion. Thank you. Thank you. Very much. Next speaker, please . And good afternoon supervisors. And it was very interested and interesting to me for the da, because i support all parts of the law enforcement. But i was really surprised when the da compared the people like with a Million Dollar bond murder, you know, committing a murder, to what is going on here today. Because, i was like what . How can you just like the sheriff was saying, it is apples and oranges to the way in los angeles, but, we just like when i was in
The law enforcement. But i was really surprised when the da compared the people like with a Million Dollar bond murder, you know, committing a murder, to what is going on here today. Because, i was like what . How can you just like the sheriff was saying, it is apples and oranges to the way in los angeles, but, we just like when i was in my addiction some years ago, and i was in the middle of the revolving door because of my addiction, but, with the money that could be saved for opening a new jail, that if people are allowed to go on the monitoring and process that could go into housing, and then, in the Mental Health services and other things that would that is really needed to help the people stay out of jail. So, i really wish that you would bring this forth to the full board, thank you. Thank you, next speaker . Good afternoon. My name is luke gordon and i am the executive director of recovery survival, and i am here in full support of the electronic monitoring and home detention.
And, it is not be a. Your office allows for the monitoring and you are basically able to allow for the individuals to be in the system, is that true . I am not sure that i understand the question. Lets say now, can, your office offer an individual to be electronically monitored . Well, in the bail proceedings. During the arraignment, the court ultimately makes the decision we make the argument and the Defense Council makes the argument about what we think is appropriate and you can imagine the scenario where the defense attorney will say this person is safe and he will come back to court and you should release him on the promise. And we might be saying we disagree with that and we think that there is danger or a risk of him not determining and the judge makes a determination of multiple things set, bail and release them on the promise to appear and on supervised promise to appear and go through the pretrial and have a case manager and i believe that in the Court Electronic monitoring b