Stay updated with breaking news from Magic test. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
british prime minister s during which she became the symbol of national unity and stability in the face of profound political, social and cultural change. here at the look at the life and legacy of the queen s historian at dominic green. as a fellow of the royal historical society and a wall street journal contributor. so welcome, great to have you with us. so tell us. the particular reason that the british people have held this a queen in so much esteem? is it about her in particular or is it the monarchy in general? oh well, thank you it is both in a sense. or her sheer longevity and commitment and skill she handled the job in a very hard for people in britain, as elsewhere, to imagine a monarchy without her. she was an absolute professional throughout the period 1952 for the 70 years after words. the result was we never saw behind the curtain. we never really understood the magic. but it always worked. this is a textbook example of how a monarchy make up ancient ....
His accountability at all? depending on the number of different federal statistutes t are laecalleged to have been violated here. at what point can someone named in an indictment, an american, what did he know or when did he know it? if he intentionally engaged in this information, yes, there may be credibility. there s so many federal fraud and abuse acts, so many federal statutes that relate to something like this and even stolen property crimes could potentiallial ply in cases like this. so it s hard to say, but i can tell you generally speaking, intent, and not just intent to communicate, but intent to achieve some unlawful objective will be the magic test here. okay. so in trump s presidential culpability here, this is something getting a lot aut ot ....
Defense? that s a similar analysis but that is the magic test to find out whether or not based on any mental defect he s able to help his own defense. if not, a defendant can be incompetent and you cannot institute proceedings against them until if and when he becomes competent again. he s not being cooperative in letting them evaluate him. where do they go from here? it s an interest issue, it s a logic loop. they can t begin to assess his competency if he doesn t cooperate but at the same time, if he s not going to cooperate, they won t get any information. however, there are ways of evaluating competency that don t require solely on the words that come out of the mouth of the defendant. frankly, not only if can a defendant remain silent, he can also tell them what he thinks they want to hear. these experts are trained to assess whether or not a defendant is trying to bam boozele them or raise issues of ....