Not understood] cat tools and bull rushes [speaker not understood] removed in order to reduce obstructions to water flow into the pump intake structure. That is an indication of enhancing water flow at sharp park. I dont know what is. We didnt leave it at that. We also included in the record a deposition of the person who actually manages this pump for rec and Park Department, a guy named john [speaker not understood] and what he told us under oath is that the existing pumphouse, although it has a 10,000 gallon per minute capacity, currently only operates at about 6,000 gallons per minute. This is in exhibit b of the documents that we sent submitted to you. We asked them a question. We said, as best as you under it from your experience, if the [speaker not understood] are removed, the pumps would be able to get water out [speaker not understood] . Yes. Do you [speaker not understood]. Even a winter like last year when there was a lot of rain . An objection from attorneys on the other s
That flows through sharp park as its implemented. The easiest answer to explain is look at the project description. The project description says on page 4 the primary purpose of this project of the proposed construction includes to remove impediments to water flow within the wetland. It goes on on page 6 to say the sediment and emergent [speaker not understood] cat tools and bull rushes [speaker not understood] removed in order to reduce obstructions to water flow into the pump intake structure. That is an indication of enhancing water flow at sharp park. I dont know what is. We didnt leave it at that. We also included in the record a deposition of the person who actually manages this pump for rec and Park Department, a guy named john [speaker not understood] and what he told us under oath is that the existing pumphouse, although it has a 10,000 gallon per minute capacity, currently only operates at about 6,000 gallons per minute. This is in exhibit b of the documents that we sent subm
On the adoption without reference to committee calendar. Please note that Public Comment is not allowed on items already subject to Public Comment by a board committee. Please direct your remarks to the board as a whole, not to individual supervisors, nor to the audience. Speakers using translation assistance will be allow twice the amount of time. And if you would like a document to be displayed on the overhead projector, please clearly state such to sfgovtv and remove the document when the screen should return to live coverage of the meeting. Lets hear from our first speaker. You have two minutes. Yes, ill be making a display. My name is peter war field. Im executive direct r of Library Users association and i want to talk a little about the history of library secrecy and its ongoing bad effect. In 1988, San Francisco voters approved a 109 million bond program whose ultimate cost was 188 million. And to build a stateoftheart main library, new main library that would have room for dec