Stay updated with breaking news from May 1ath. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
ukraine s president calls the move historic . tonight with the context, former senior advisor to george w bush, ron christie. and former advisor to hillary clinton, amanda renteria. the us supreme court has upheld the right of americans to carry guns in public, striking down a century old restrictions in new york that limited the ability of people to carry weapons. the legislation required residents to prove they had proper cause to have a concealed handgun. the judges ruled that it violated the constitutional right to bear arms. the governor of new york state kathy hochul described the ruling as outrageous. this decision isn tjust reckless, it s reprehensible. it s not what new yorkers want. and we should have the right of determination of what we want to do in terms of our gun laws in our state. the federal government will not have sweeping laws to protect us, then our states and our governors have a moral responsibility to do what we can, and have laws to protect ....
To prove that parliament in the 18th century passed something like it or similar to it, century passed something like it or similarto it, and century passed something like it or similar to it, and that modern legislators really can t do anything unless they legislate your 100, 200 years ago enacted a law in that area, and that s just a very bizarre way to think about how legislations function, and really how the constitution functions. if you are going to look to history, you have to make a minimal effort to get the history right, and it s clear that this court really doesn t care about that. ,, ., this court really doesn t care about that. ,, . ., ., this court really doesn t care about that. ,, ., ., ., ~ ., that. stay there, i want to talk to ou that. stay there, i want to talk to you more. that. stay there, i want to talk to you more. but that. stay there, i want to talk to you more, but for that. stay there, i want to talk to you more, but for now, - that. stay there, i want ....
Amendment. by the court s own framework, that should have made this law constitutionallyjustified, because it would have been long standing and it would have reflected the views of americans and the public meaning of the text at the public meaning of the text at the time of the 1ath amendment. but justice thomas just sort of ignores that, he simply doesn t know what s going on. he completely ignores that most of the states rewrote their arms provisions in the era of the 1ath amendment to expresslyjustify the regulation of arms in public, but you don t see that mentioned. justice allito literally stopped reading the text in the middle. he didn t get to the part that talked about regulation of arms in public. who stopped reading the text in the middle? . . who stopped reading the text in the middle? ., ., ., ,~/ who stopped reading the text in the middle? ., ., ., ., middle? amanda, do you agree with ron that this ....