Stay updated with breaking news from Michael Berardi. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Careless naming of inventors on a patent application can create confusion and add complexity to an already intricate process. The recent case of Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Prod., Inc. is a great example where failure to properly list a co-inventor resulted in the only named inventor losing their patent rights.
Objective Evidence in Determining Obviousness - In Medtronic, Inc. v. Teleflex Innovations, Appeal No. 21-2357, the Federal Circuit held that a close prima facie case of...
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling to correct inventorship on hose patents after plaintiff proved the patent holder had gotten ideas for his invention after the two met. Blue Gentian LLC v Tristar Products Inc.
BLUE GENTIAN, LLC v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC - Before Prost, Chen, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. - ...
A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent...