Page 2 - Monuments Clause News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Show joe biden has taken as foreign government since he's been in office? they don't exist. >> i want to get your read on what i said in the previous block. i don't know if you saw, it but just about how it seems to be a little parallel between what happened in that close during trump and what is happening in the 14th amendment, section three. which is basically nobody could bring themselves in the courts, they can bring themselves to bite the bullet on what was plainly the case constitutionally, undergo it just sort of ran out of steam, and they basically foot dragged, and it got looted. and ...

Just sort of ran out of steam, and they basically foot dragged, and it got looted. and then it seems like there was an interesting discussion point for the courts here on the 14th amendment. >> the self proclaimed originalist and textualists are just trumpists. because it is very clear in both cases you cite, that section three of the 14th amendment which says that if you've engaged in insurrection or rebellion, you can't hold office again. and here with the monuments clause, you just can't take any money from foreign governments and kings and princes without going to congress for us. it is ve...

>> no question. the clause was stated in an absolute categorical terms that the president, and no federal official can take any money of any kind whatsoever in the monumental office where the president has a title from the prince, king, or foreign government without the explicit consent of congress. and every other president in our history has scrupulously obeyed that command. abraham lincoln, in 1862, in the middle of the civil war was given to elephantiasic by the king of santa. he turned them over to >> -- it appears he wanted to keep somebody said no you can keep, them turn them over to th...

Countries with china making the largest total payment to president trump's private business interests. now this finding is particularly coming in almost comical considering the wild goose chase that the republican members of the same committee have been leaning against president joe biden. they are trying to impeach the current president over his adult son's business relationship with the company while joe biden was out of office. they are claiming without any evidence of some of those payments went to biden a senior. meanwhile, democrats just revealed 156 pages of evidence about the millions ...

Might as well just no longer be in the constitution. now it seems like we may get a similar point with another key portion of the constitution. section three of the 14th amendment, that is the closet prohibits any officer of the united states when engaged in insurrection from ever holding office again. last month, the colorado supreme court and maine secretary of state ruled that donald trump is in violation of that section of the constitution. subsequently, he cannot appear in the ballot on those states. the big question is whether the supreme court will uphold the sections or whether section...