Live Breaking News & Updates on National Security Doesn T
Stay updated with breaking news from National security doesn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Than him. again, that s an incumbent who is being defeated by huge numbers. that is a huge red flag right there. first of all, that mark harris goes from four absentee by mail votes in 2016 to like 400 in 2018. but it shows you that the two campaigns he was working for, his ties to these blowout victories and the numbers just stand out completely against what the other results are in the ninth district. what strikes me about this is this was not that secret in the sense that you, a very enterprising local tv reporter, has now been able to have two on camera interviews with individuals paid by him to do something facially illegal under north carolina law, protect ballots. this doesn t seem like a secret. am i wrong? everybody in bladen county seems to know who mccray dallas is, and i ll tell you pretty much everyone has an idea of what he s about. maybe not specifically what he ....
Right now. particularly, for this white house, which looks at they took great pride in the first week, being able to roll out executive orders. to be essentially halted on this, charles raised an interesting point earlier. it has gotten lost in the discussion. if you take trump at his word, the reason he instituted this band, he felt like a vetting from a lot of countries in the middle east was not tough enough. it is possible to tighten vetting without doing this order. i think this is a really interesting question we need to put him on. if that is really our focus, will you walk away from us executive action and just focus on tightening the vetting program? if he does that, you could see him moving on pretty quickly to health care, tax reform, not getting bogged down in this legal argument. he is a very prideful person, someone who doesn t like to lose. you can see them wanting to push this forward. proof of his administration ....
United states using intelligence information he has to try to protect national security. chris: we bring lisa in. one of the counter arguments was the judge, and again, there are some interesting facts. you hear the judge in federal district court in washington state arguing with the president about national security but he said there is no evidence that any of the people from these seven countries have committed fatal terrorist attacks and the argument about national security doesn t hold much sway. for the trump administration, the haziness has hurt the administration. whether it was the chaos over green cards or the fact that they move forward without having the supreme court nominee in place. i think we ve seen a lot of tension in congress, and that s only going to escalate because the democratic party is going to be looking for any winds they can get. they can certainly point of this as a win. but i think it s going to further hurt president trump as he tries to move forward h ....
The stay stand. i don t know what they are going to decide but they should have a contingency plan ready as of yesterday. chris: regardless of the merits of this argument, the idea that the courts can sit there and say your argument about national security doesn t persuade us, that s happened before during the bush administration. there were several decisions after 9/11 that president bush made and the supreme court, several times, said no, you ve gone too far here. you ve got to stop. it s not been unusual but it is unusual for it to happen in the first ten days of a new administration. chris: i assume unprecedented. with obama, the temporary stay on the immigration, legalization of the 5 million illegal immigrants in the country, it was stayed by a district judge in texas and remained in place up until today ....
This executive order was very limited in the policy overall. the temporary suspension of the executive order being upheld by this court, it s going to head to the supreme court most likely. this is not the massive blow to president trump us policies that say it is up in court ruling striking down obamacare would have been to the obama administration. chris: but it s not nothing when you are talking about 20 days into administration. this is still a significant blow to have this executive order and a court of appeals, whether it s right or wrong, for the court of appeals to slap it down. when you mention the time frame, that doesn t speak to the substantive policy implications. it only speaks to optics and politics. earlier, we heard the suggestion from charles krauthammer that this could be wonderful politics ....