Need Internment Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They put another on the books. >> nina. >> i think it's fair to say that this decision does give the president, this president and any president, more power than they had before for all practical purposes almost no bars that have to be crossed. that are too difficult to cross. if all you have to do is show there's arguably a connection to national security, almost anybody can make that argument. in some ways the trump administration is lucky that the first two of them, two versions of this got struck down by the lower courts because it's not entirely clear to me what the court would have done ...

>> let me do one thing on this is the other thing that happened tonight that's so unusual. that's an usual thing to occur in the middle of this decision. take a look at donald trump doing what his lawyers would advise against which is siting that disfavored precedent on this issue. >> what i'm doing is no different than what fdr. fdr's solution for germans, italians, japanese. >> you're for internment camps? >> this is a president highly respected by all. he did the same thing. if you look at what he was doing, it was far worse. >> he did the same thing. that was candidate trump defense. r u a...

Its view on a totallyunrelated historical case that until today remained a shameful precedent on the books in american court history. the supreme court infamously upheld the legality of japanese internment. a precedent that's been discussed a lot lately given trump's internment and separation of immigrant families. in response about the travel ban, the conservative majority on this court writes this. if old decision upholding internment was wrong the day it decided and has no place in law under the constitution. there is much important substance in this decision. whether one agrees with the re...

Decisions, not the courts, not outsiders. >> right. i think you're eluding to a point thatnina was making earlier in other case law in controversial situations we know the court or a block of the court doesn't like to second guess potential national security in realtime. >> lower courts have made this decision before also. i mean if you look back, a federal judge said that a federal court should not even hear a case related to determining whether or not the chief executive can make or decide who comes into our country and who doesn't come into our country we can argue the points about rhetoric...

Emphatically and finally said that happy need internment decision was wrong and if so, was donald trump wrong to invoke it? >> i can't speak for the president and i have not read the full roreport or the full ruling from the supreme court. i do agree with you it's very unusual they would go back that far and bring something up like this. i think i'll have to stand on my earlier comments that what makes this such a landmark decision is the supreme court said our president has the sole authority to make these decisions. i think that's the important take away here. >> you know -- >> nina and then...