Page 44 - Ninth Amendment News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Amherst professor Austin Sarat and former federal prosecutor Dennis Aftergut argue that Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, together with the language in Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion, put the country on a path toward the totalitarian state that one-time Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork had envisioned. Professor Sarat and Mr. Aftergut point out that Bork’s America would have a constitution that does not evolve or change to meet new circumstances and that affords no protection of citizens’ privacy from government int...

With the end of Roe v. Wade, "legal realism" looks more plausible — that is, judges deciding based on personal biases instead of the law or precedent.

If Ginni Thomas has no right to express her opinions and have conversations about those opinions as a private citizen, then neither do you.

We are asking you - our readers - to let us know what you think.

Dobbs reverses Roe by rewriting the law of precedent. This will open up many other cases for reversal, writes political science professor Morgan Marietta.