meritocracy approve of this decisiony ap. a few d just a few days ago, cbs newss ran a poll asking americans about this very issue. ver70% responded that colleges should not be allowed to use race in college admissions. a new york times poll recentlyam found 60% of democrats also oppose race as a factor in admissions. americans across the country have rejected affirmative action at the ballot box, too, evenat the b in blue state calia in the 2020 election. democratic leaders in the state put affirmative action on the ballot. the pre action oo affirmative an activists, the governor, both supp senators, even the golden state warriors, pushed voters to support the initiativthey oe they outspent opponents of oppon affirmative action by 19 to 1. and in the end, nearly 60% of californians voted to kill affirmative action. . it didn t work. no matter how hard the democratic party matte trieo matter how much money spen wpin, the american people have rejected the view that we should b
can you imagine finally owning something in this country and the government tellinge wors you how to run it, making life worse? they want to take back.ak they want to take the black community back to a time whereis it was illegal for us to own firearms with policies like gune control. the law ma y have not been made is ou for us, but it s ours now and we don t plan on giving it back. this systemic progressive ism starts at the top, though. here s the president othf the united states earlier today. watch. the colleges could use rac e nottor fo as a determining factor for admissions , but as one ofding the factors among many in deciding who to admiitt froma qu a quote from a qualified, already qualified pool of al. today th today, the court once again walked away from decadesce of precedent and make. as the dissent has made clear. the dissent states and today s decision, quotdissent es back decades of precedent and momentountous progress