Stay updated with breaking news from Number 1. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
and i just want to point out something that we had mentioned, that andrew had mentioned that clearly attorney number 1 is evan corcoran, attorney number 3 is clearly trump lawyer christina bobb, who did sign that affidavit. trump employee 2 is likely the maintenance worker, carlos dealivara and the trump family member, when they referred to ma am and the plane to bedminster, melania trump. just one other point for the table. for those of us who cover politics as well as the legal ramifications, we have our experts. we have seen what the polling was after the indictment of donald trump in the albert bragg case. this is a real test of what the reaction is going to be politically to this incredibly detailed and legally our experts ....
It denoted that the information in the document was releasable only to the five eyes intelligence alliance consisting of australia, canada, new zealand, the united kingdom and the united states. nauta texted trump employee number 2, i opened the door and found this. nauta also attached two photographs he took of the spill, here we have them up on the screen now. trump employee number 2 replied, oh, no, oh, no, and i m sorry potus had my phone. one of the photographs which is interesting, we can get into. that, one of the photos is depicted below with the visible classified information redacted. trump s unlawful retention of this document is charged in count 8 of the indictment. description of photo number 6, boxes stacked against the wall. we ll show this to you as well. here it is, on november 12th, 2021, trump employee 2 provided trump a photograph of his boxes in the storage room by taping it to one of the boxes that trump ....
Of a foreign attack, military capabiliies of foreign countries, regional military activities of foreign countries, and it goes on and on. and there you see just boxes stored. and again, in many cases at least according to this indictment in places where unknown numbers of people had access to them. that was the white and gold ballroom. that s the stage of the white and gold ballroom, and they say for how long those were out there while there were other events being staged in that very room, charles. just look at that and the storage room as well as chris was just pointing out. it s unbelievable and shocking in a number of respects both to you, andrea, and chris. if you think about it, i ve said for a number of times that the actual content of the documents did not matter when you were simply talking about, number one, obstruction, and number two, his retention of items that he should not have had. what was in those documents, in his possession, those two things ....
Texted another employee of that office, employees number 2 to ask whether trump s boxes could be moved out of the business center to make room for staff to use it as an office. trump employee 2 replied, whoa, okay, so potus specifically asked walt for those boxes to be in the business center because they are his and they put this in quotes papers, trump employee 1 and trump employee 2 exchanged the following text messages. trump employee 2, we can definitely make it work if we move his papers into the lake room question mark. trump employee 1, there is still a little room in the shower where his other stuff is. is it only his papers he cares about? there s some other stuff in there that are not papers. could that go to storage, or does he want everything in there on property? trump employee number 2 responds, yes, anything that s not the beautiful mind paper boxes, not sure what that is, can definitely go to storage. want to take a look at the space and start moving tomorrow ....
That you prepared for this moment for almost two years. so why is part of that plan an honor system? it s not an honor system. this is a tool that has been used in the past. the vast majority of individuals will indeed be placed in expedited removal. are you on shaky legal ground with mass releases? first of all, your question has a factual predicate with which i would disagree about mass releases, number 1. we implement our operations in conjunction with the department of justice and we have confidence in the lawfulness of our actions. the administration argues this policy will be used on a case by case basis. in 2021 and 22, they released people during peak times. they said sector chiefs can use this process if 7,000 people come up per day over 72 hours. ....