Page 24 - Nut Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> no. >> if you look at all of the evidence here, first of all, he asked comey. comey understood it to be stopping the investigation. most obstruction of justice cases, the person doesn't come out and say, oh, i'm going to obstruct the investigation. they do a wink, a not, a hint. but you've got three other key pieces of evidence here. you've got coats, and you've got rogers, both of whom trump called individually and asked them to put the squelch on the investigation. >> the director of national intelligence dan coats. reporting indicates both of them were contacted by the president. >> and ...

Comey, who is a nut case, i got the whole burden of the investigation me when i fired him. >> the prosecutor rests. >> i rest. >> here's the other argument, and i'm going to play paul ryan's case because it's slightly different than this. so there's one case that says he never directly ordered it. this is the paul ryan line, and you're seeing this increasingly, which i would summarize as the president is so naive and ignorant that he is incapable of forming the necessary intent to commit this crime. take a listen. >> the president's -- establish the relationships between doj, fbi and white hou...

Russian thing, and then you have admissions by the russian ambassador who referred to comey as a nut case and at the same time said, look, now that i've gotten rid of comey, i have this russian thing off my back. >> very quickly because they're telling me i have to take a break. very quickly, could we potentially see the president testify under oath? >> you absolutely could. there is no reason he couldn't testify. there may be a prohibition of him being indicted as a sitting president. >> but we could hear from him? >> it may not be in public. he could be called by a federal grand jury which i...

Congressional policy for decades. >> that's correct. we've had this policy ever since the founding of israel. and the original reasons for putting our primary diplomatic mission in tel aviv was security. now we've got another problem, or two problems relating to moving the embassy to jerusalem. one is security, because we would suddenly become the target of every isis nut case in the world trying to reverse that effort. the other is that we really need to take time to study this because of it's going to put to an end any opportunity for any kind of an agreement in the very short-term near futu...

Cold war era when that technology was really being pushed hard. it's hard to believe we're back at that now. it is encouraging to see that. the other thing that i would just say to any politicians that are thinking about budgeting and things like that, north korea is actively moving to a strike capability. they're saying in the next five years, they may have it. so this testing will have to continue and have to get better and better. the folks aren't going to back off. >> neil: i think it's not so much what we want to get out of kim jong-un, the north korean leader, but what you want to get ou...