Page 24 - Opinion Section News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Printed this op-ed full well knowing this information had been left out, important information -- >> if i know i was left out, i would have asked for it to be put in. i think it's important to make the distinction that the story did not run on the news pages. >> harris: i get that. but these women are journalists. >> it was it was in the opinion section. >> harris: they worked with you. >> right. >> harris: are the rules different than you can write fiction in one place and fact and the other? >> there is no evidence it was fiction. >> harris: omission of the fact that the alleged victim -- >>...

>> also, there's a question about why these new revelations, these new allegations weren't in the news section of "the times." the front page or the front section. this was relegated to the sunday review which is an opinion section. did news editors turn down your approach to them to say, hey, we have some new information? >> so i disagree with the word relegated. i knowledthink the sunday revie section is a place where "times" authors run excerpts of their book. it's happened recently with our tv critic. it happens on a regular basis. we thought that was a good home for the piece. we shared t...

Are also reporters. not just the reporters. really the entire institution is to blame. they shouldn't just pass it off on the reporters. having said that in npr interview that aired yesterday these reporters did the exact same thing. they made it sound like they had a credible story about a woman and they hid the fact that the woman dnged it ever happened. brian: really? i did not know that. >> you cannot blame that on editors. hour long interview. plenty of time to discuss it. brian: dumping on the opinion editor of the opinion section of the "times" i put it in there and they cut it out on h...

Brian: "new york times" edit as book that the "new york times" wrote she said she in no word that an important point of the second accuser. the second accuser of brett kavanaugh does not remember the incident. and the lawyer that brought it forward that said he saw it, write him down as a part partisan attorney when he actually worked for bill clinton during the whole impeachment mess. you cannot pretend that stier, this attorney is nonsupport san and doesn't have a horse in this race. you can't pretend they are in a word count in the "new york times" opinion section as if they have to cut it ...

Person. that is not enough to print it, particularly in the newspaper. if there's an excerpt from a book that they are advertising on behalf of these reporters sticking it into the newspaper in the opinion section and using that as a basis to make these allegations, i think both of those things are problematic journalistically. howard: susan, these may be lies, but we don't know. it's two journalists reporting a book. is the president on solid ground in saying, first of all, these are lies; second of all, they are trying to intimidate kavanaugh into making more liberal rulingsing, and finally,...