Order Temporary Restraining News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Have long-term rights. government's -- that applies outside the boundaries of the u.s. and extends beyond people who have been -- who are in the u.s. or who have been in the u.s. thank you. >> thank you. mr. per sell, yes. may it place the court. state attorney noah per tel. it has been the judicial role to state what the -- that judicial law has never been important in recent memory than it been today. the court is requesting the court to reinstate the order without review and to through the country back in chaos. the court should decline that.

He acting pursuant to delegation of authority. our position is no he acting contrary to what congress has said. every single person is harmed by the order, it's important to consider how much deference to give to the conserexecutive on point. >> there been order in the past that treated people based on their nation. why should that suggest to us that the statute should be harm in way other than one you're advocating. >> all of those orders are been narrower than the one here. >> if you single out cubans because they are from cuba that's doing by class based on narcot nationalality. i have not ...

>> the statutory ground would help us with regard to those seeking immigrant visa, is that correct? >> yes under, i think this is largely correct. 1152 speak of immigrant visa. there cannot discrimination in issuing those visa. >> that's not a way to avoid all constitutional claim because it wouldn't cover everyone. >> it would not allow you to avoid constitutional issues. we believe it is very strong claim that the order violates the ina. it goes to level of difference what old to executive. the president is claiming that

Opportunity to enter something it things is a preliminary order. issue an order preliminary injunction order. if you decide not to do this, if you decide to treat this preliminary ruling and stay motion i ask to issue an opinion that treetsz treats it like reprelimary ruling that -- the other side that the federal government argued they intent to seek immediate review if the court denies the stay. if the court it would be unfair to this court and the district court to have the federal government try to take to the u.s. supreme court an order that was framed as tro and the judge understandly en...

United states by favoring one group over another. equal protection clause because it relies on the ability to receive visit from friends and family what allowing others to receive those visits. the second point is as in den the u.s. citizen do have right it would not address their rights to limit it that way. defendant have not explained how they would implement the order they are proposing. their approach would travel and reentry by thousands of people who live here, work here who have to travel to visit family or how they would be able to do