Page 5 - Panel Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Im pleased to welcome our witness, ambassador , thank you for coming. We have been eager to have you before the committee. For a very important annual hearing to discuss the president s agenda. The laws that delegate congresses constitutional trade authority to the executive, also require close consultation with congress. This hearing is an important part of that consultation, and it provides an opportunity to explain the president s ambitious trade agenda to congress. And all americans. Members of this committee are looking forward to this important discussion. A critical component of the tra...

The oral argument is one hour d inutes. Hear argument first this morning, case 23411, murthy v. Missouri. Mr. Fletcher. Mr. Fletcher thank you. The government may not use corso e speed for itself i informing, persuading or criticizing private speakers. This case should be about the fundamental distinction between persuasion and coercion. This is not a typical student where a speaker challenges Government Actions affecting its own speech. Two states and five individuals are trying to use this to with and about social media platforms. That problem has infected every part of the case. Respondents...

In september 2018, coinciding with the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Brett kavanaugh, Gabrielle Blair tweeted the following im a mother of six and a mormon. I have a good understanding of arguments surrounding abortion, religion and otherwise. Ive been listening to men grandstand about womens reproductive rights, and im convinced men actually have zero interest in stopping abortion. Heres why. Her 63 tweet thread quickly went viral and formed the basis for ejaculate responsibly, which became an instant New York Times bestseller when it was published last year. Up until that t...

Only if viewed objectively. And because nose av justice ti the government. Justice thas employing state action . Often, and suing the government. Things like medicare or government contracts, tieoblem if the government stays on the side of coercionecinal question. Rn ghin g,owbeurount ri cve rc plteneurthciy on ngar at chet innsn ye to let me follow up on that. Even if one of the plaintiffs have standing, we are requiredthhe utwas restricted at the time when the complaint was filed. Why ha oty eest t , thin and you havent attempted to show that the fio,th notion of traceability. Ta and the pla...

Will be hearing oral argument in murthy versus missouri, a case on federal Government Officials communicating with social Media Companies about content mediation policies and whether it amounts to government suppression or speech censorship. This oral argument will begin shortly. You are watching live coverage here on cspan. We will hear argument first this morning, case 23 411. Esther fletcher. Mr. Fletcher the government may not use corso threat to suppress speech but it is entitled the speed for itself i informing, persuading or criticizing private speakers. This case should be about the fu...