Plutonium Back News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

win the battle and lose the war. you know? there is a -- if you discredit or politicize the justice department in the eyes of 60 million americans, you haven't gained that much even if you've got these classified documents. so that is the balance that i think and i'm sure they're thinking about, which is very difficult. because with anybody else you would just say, look. you broke the law or you seem to have broken the law. we have to get these documents back. >> what strikes me when you say that is the idea of obviously it is a bit of a damned if you do damned if you don't philosoph...

(burke) that's not wrong. when you bundle your home and auto policies with farmers, you save yourself up to twenty percent. (customer) that's something. (burke) get a whole lot of something with farmers. kinda creepy. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ our top story tonight, the mar-a-lago search warrant has been unsealed. investigators removing 11 sets of classified documents at trump's home, including one marked "top secret slrks sci", one of the nation's highest levels of classification. the warrant identifies three federal crimes the doj is looking into as part...

Heard about the prime minister of france i thought, hum. is trump looking to blackmail? i really want to address a couple things that fareed said. you know, one that i agree with and have agreed with is it won't be enough just to show the facts and the law. there will be at the end of the day a best interests of the day analysis. second, however, the notion that, well, there are different violations under this statute and some are relatively benign, no, no, no. we are talking about materials. imagine that these aren't pieces of paper, but these are pieces of plutonium. and even if you careless...

Plutonium and even if you carelessly smuggled them out the u.s. comes and says we need that plutonium back and you say, what plutonium? we need that plutonium back. you try to destroy it. this is inherently, by actual definition, dangerous to the united states' interests and very serious. finally, the point about publication. i take his point but it is nuanced because there the doj is damned if you do and damned if you don't. things they are protecting on the other side, integrity of the investigation, identity of the confidential informant, they uniquely can't willy nilly ignore which is why ...