Stay updated with breaking news from Privilege claim. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Donald trump put his lawyer in jeopardy, potentially by lying to his lawyer about certain facts. because of that, you now have this exception coming into play. it generally goes into, you know, behaviors of the lawyer, behaviors of the client, and how that affects that whole idea of attorney-client privilege. and doing things that break that privilege. in this case, there was clearly evidence there that donald trump probably, looking at it from that standpoint, said something, told his lawyer, gave his lawyer information, put his lawyer in the situation where that privilege claim could not be upheld. now, we ll get to see at some point what that was. but it is a significant turn in this case. it really says a lot about how, in many respects, and we have seen this before, joe, donald ....
Does a lawyer ever have any pause in this delay, delay, delay, a criminal investigation into a coup? well, i think, you know, your job as a lawyer is to advocate for your client. i have no problem asserting these privileges. i don t think it s done in some sort of bad faith. i do think that pence s claim to have speech or debate immunity is to use the technical legal term preposture, both because the text of the constitution, which pence claims to care about in his whole mantra about strict construction and so on, the text says that privilege only applies to, quote, senators and representatives, and last i checked, pence was neither. and the text also says that there s an exception for speech or debate immunity for, quote, treason, felony, or breach of the peace. and january 6th is actually not just one of those, which would be sufficient or two of them, it s not just a two-fer, it s a three-fer. it s all three of those. i don t think this privilege claim is going anywhere ....
Let me tell you, tonight, trials have a way of bringing things into focus. that s the case for richard barnette, convicted after trial this week for his role on january 6th. guilty, all eight counts. that was the case for bannon, navarro s co-conspirator in the coupe or sweep. convicted of defying the committee. we re seeing some of this happen for navarro. there s a new document that i m going to tell you about right now for the first time. in this case, which proves peter navarro did not, not have a privilege claim from trump at any point during the january 6th committee probe. navarro was incorrect to imply otherwise and it s exactly what i was bearing down on in that exchange, which got less attention or notice perhaps than him admitting the sweep, but is important right now. and let me tell you about this document. this is bad news for navarro and ....
Where they were just slow walking it for two years. which is hard to understand the flip side of this. i would say this to other things about this, which about me. number one, raffensperger call deals with illegality, and the ball passed by the guilty, and this donald trump. i mean, you talk to raffensperger when your best skin donald trump exclusively to see if he broke the law. the thing is they did talk to white house lawyers last week. that is huge. as weird as this is, as weird and as late as this all seems. the fact that they broke down that wall, over top of the white house lawyers, and broke through that privilege claim. that is a big deal. charlie, i want to bring you in and talk about something that congressman marjorie taylor greene has said this weekend. she said it quite proudly that if it had been up to her. if she, and steve bannon had planned january six, she said. it wouldn t have been worse, and they all would ve been armed. first of all, let me give you the quote. ....
You, don t need the committee. the only people who knew about exclusively to think if he broke the law. the other thing is they did talk to the white house lawyers right? that is huge. so as we are does this, is as weird and late as this all seems, the fact that they broke down that wall and we re talking to white house lawyers and broke through that privilege claim, that is a big deal. i want to bring you in and talk about something that congresswoman marjorie taylor greene said this weekend. she is quite, she said it quite proudly, that if it had been up to her, if she and steve bannon had planned january 6th she said, it would have been worse and they all would ve been armed. first of all, let me give you the quote, not to mention it would have been armed. it was armed first of all. would ve been worse? more than 140 police officers would have been badly injured? she is proud of this. and the point of ....