Live Breaking News & Updates on Procedural

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Procedural on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Procedural and stay connected to the pulse of your community

CNN News Central

house floor this morning. morning involving speaker johnson and some of those hardline members at one point republican congressman derrick van orden, who's a johnson ally, jumped in. he referred to matt gaetz as tbi. and the hardliners were also pressing johnson for commitment that he wasn't going to change that motion to vacate tool. but at this moment, johnson has not made any decisions all right. >> a lot of mature behavior going on there on the house floor clearly. >> is there any indication melanie, at this point there has been some talk that democrats may save johnson both to get this foreign aid package done, but also if it comes to his speakership as well, what are you hearing about that? >> yeah, there are active discussions inside the democratic caucus, right now, not only just about saving johnson's speakership, but also democrats putting up the votes for a key procedural, procedural vote for those foreign aid bills, democrats do want to see those bills passed they're also sick of the chaos in the house as well. and so there is some openness on the behalf of democrats to stepping in and bailing out johnson. but

Mike-johnson , Some , House , Members , Speaker , Commitment , Floor , Congressman-derrick-van-orden , Hardliners , Ally , Republican , Matt-gaetz

CNN Newsroom Live

pressure on chief justice john roberts to build consensus behind the scenes and come up with a path forward where at least the vote count, whatever it ends up being, on whatever decision they make, does not appear partisan. but certainly, an enormous case for the court, and an enormous test for the chief justice. paula reid, cnn, washington. >> former state and federal prosecutor, and cnn senior legal analyst elie honig weighed in on the u.s. supreme court's decision to hear the colorado case. take a listen. >> i do not expect the supreme court to address the issue of insurrection, whether donald trump did or did not engage in insurrection. that's not the kind of thing that the u.s. supreme court normally does, they're not a fact-finding body. i expect them to deal with the procedural and constitutional questions. two in particular. first of all, is it up to congress to pass laws telling us how the 14th amendment works, or is it up to the states to figure it out on their own? if the supreme court decides this is only up to congress,

Case , Court , Pressure , Decision , John-roberts , Path , Vote-count , Being , Build-consensus , Behind-the-scenes , Supreme-court , Cnn

The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer

array of lawyers. >> it will be so, so important. elie hoe anything, as joan just said it was expected that the u.s. supreme court would take this case on, but we still don't know how they'll approach it. what do you expect? >> right, wolf. as joan said, the order issued today is a few sentences. it does not specify what particular issues. however, i do think there are some things we can reasonably expect. first of all, i do not expect the supreme court to address the issue of insurrection, whether donald trump did or did not engage in insurrection. that's not the kind of thing the u.s. supreme court normally does. they're not a fact-finding body. i expect them to deal with the procedural and constitutional questions, two in particular. first of all, is it up to congress to pass laws telling us how the 14th amendment works or is it up to the states to figure it out on their own? if the supreme court decides this is only up to congress, that will end the colorado challenge, put trump back on the ballot in colorado and effectively end all of the challenges we've seen all across

Case , U-s-supreme-court , Elie-hoe-anything , Lawyers , Array , All , Issue , Insurrection , Things , Order , Wolf-blitzer , Issues

CNN This Morning

insurrection or not, that's not for the supreme the court. they are not going to go through the facts and remind the facts. that's for the trial part. supreme court didn't even do that. >> for somebody watching this and why not? >> the supreme court does not have trial capacity. what the supreme court does is take the record, as we call it, as established in a trial court. and they can base a legal decision. they don't have a witness box. they have argument peddle stalls basically. i would focus on the procedural here. is it up to congress or up to the states. that's the first question. second of all, if up to the states, did they give trump enough due process? and then there's this question that makes you nuts. is the president an officer. the reason you find that frustrating is because you have a very logical brain, which would say, of course, the president is an officer, but the

Supreme-court , Insurrection , Somebody , Facts , Trial-part , Supreme-the-court , Supreme-court-didn-t , Decision , Record , Trial-court , Trial-capacity , Witness-box

CNN This Morning

usually the side that loses goes to the supreme court asking for the supreme court to take the case. usually, the side that won below says no, you should not take the case because if they don't, whoever wins below, they win. we see most of the people on both sides asking the supreme court formally on the record saying, yes, you should take it. whatever the disagreements have been and certainly will be, everyone agrees on both sides of this. supreme court has to take this. everyone agrees they have to take it quickly. we're under deadlines here almost day by day. >> different posture from trump's legal team that wants everything delayed and pushed as far as possible. in the appeal itself, you predicted four critical buckets. no insurrection, congress, no due process, the president is not an officer. when you combed through those, what sticks out to you? >> definitely focus on the procedural. the argument of did he engage in

Supreme-court , Jeffrey-epstein-case , Side , People , Everyone , Sides , Saying , Record , Disagreements , Most , Yes , Donald-trump

Substantial due process vs Procedural due process in termination of employees

Substantial due process vs Procedural due process in termination of employees

Manila , Philippines , Justice-diosdado-peralta , Terms-of-service , Distribution-control-products-inc-tiamsic , National-labor-relations-commission , Supreme-court , Brown-madonna-press-inc , Manila-times , Labor-code , Honorable-chief-justice-diosdado-peralta , Control-products-inc

Deadline White House

donald trump have to explain that to a federal judge who's presiding over his felony case. >> mary, let me read for you an interesting passage here from page 9. it's headlined "other disputed revisions." and it's kind of revealing. and we'll get into it in a second. but part of it reads, "despite the extraordinarily limited time president trump had to prepare this response, we attempted to confer with the government in good faith over the weekend by sending our proposed revisions and arranging multiple phone calls. setting aside our general dispute regarding the treatment of nonsensitive documents, we had hoped the government would engage with us in a collaborative dialogue aimed at fashioning mutually agreeable language for numerous procedural and definitional clauses in the proposed order. unfortunately, the government declined the cooperative approach, refusing to provide any real-time feedback. ultimately, just hours before our deadline the government notified defense counsel it would oppose most of our

Tanya-chutkan , Donald-trump , It , Kind , Page-3 , Mary-mccord , Revisions , Felony-case , Passage , Revealing , 9 , Deadline-trump

CNN Primetime

say. i want to go quickly back to paula reid. trump is expected to appear in court tomorrow. >> we're expecting the former president to come here to washington, d.c. to attend this hearing in person. it's unclear if we're actually going to get to see him. there's no cameras in federal court, and this particular courthouse is very custom to dealing with vips, people with security details. and you can easily drive into the garage underneath the courthouse and not be seen at all. but once he's inside the courthouse, he's effectively under arrest. he will be processed. we expect they'll take his fingerprints. we don't expect, though, he'll have a mug shot. this is an issue they dealt with in manhattan and florida. the consensus is mug shots are used by law enforcement if someone goes on the lam, but everybody knows what former president trump looks like. now, the hearing itself will be pretty quick, procedural. we expect he'll hear the charges that have been filed against him, have the opportunity to enter a plea, and this hearing also is not going to be before

Trump , President , Hearing , Paula-reid , Court , Washington-d-c- , Person , People , Courthouse , Cameras , Federal-court , Vips

Fox News at Night

the other is procedural which is knowing how to ride oo bike. episodic is the first to go with alzheimer's. procedural is preserved until the late stages of alzheimer's. he was diagnosed seven years ago. the prognosis is between eight to ten years. there are people who have lived longer. eight to ten year mark is usually what to expect in terms of prognosis. he was performing into the five year mark. he had the procedural memory in tact up until that point. >> 96 years old, does that prize you or no? >> no it doesn't. people who are diagnosed over the age of 80 have the best prognosis. he was one of them. >> it's great to have you on. thank you. >> first up in tonight's viral videos. a trip the the london zoo where penguins have their swimming

First , Other , Procedural , Stages , Alzheimer-s , Episodic , Oo-bike , Seven , People , Prognosis , Memory , Mark

CNN News Central

stand. i do want to note the broader context between kevin mccarthy, the house speaker and donald trump when that's remarks were being made. they came in a sven call after mccarthy had enraged trump, his advisors and allies by saying in an interview on cnbc that he just wasn't sure that trump was the strongest candidate in 2024. and he called him to apologize for that and that is when this came up. but, again, not making any promises, and clearly part of a larger narrative of mccarthy trying to win back favor with the former president as his aids and alleys continue to raise questions as to why speaker mccarthy has not endorsed trump in 2024. something that we're clearly keeping an eye on. but, it doesn't sound like even if he was to bring the resolution, they would have the votes or any proc procedural consequence. >> let's discuss all of this

Donald-trump , Trump , Kevin-mccarthy , Advisors , Call , Context , Interview , Allies , House-speaker , Remarks , Candidate , Part