Page 12 - Properties Last News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

As you stated that this is a mess, the work that was done was done prior to section 317 of the planning code, and which regulates the demolition, and the staff, and in reviewing this, and the initially they had filed for the section 317 review but the staff reviewed calculations provided by the project sponsor which led them to determine that if they retained those walls, that it would not be classified as a demolition under the planning code and looking at the plans anew, i have the concerns about that determination, but also i have concerns about how we deal with Something Like this over all...

Mess, the work that was done was done prior to section 317 of the planning code, and which regulates the demolition, and the staff, and in reviewing this, and the initially they had filed for the section 317 review but the staff reviewed calculations provided by the project sponsor which led them to determine that if they retained those walls, that it would not be classified as a demolition under the planning code and looking at the plans anew, i have the concerns about that determination, but also i have concerns about how we deal with Something Like this over all, where the work and everythi...

Little bit of their Basketball Court on the right. This is the excelsior tennis court and basketball on the right. And this is Crocker Amazon as basketball and open play and le grande halfcourt. The reason i bring this up, i dont think 250,000 for a onetime expenditure will be enough. This is just one district and there are several districts throughout the city, and i think this is probably a need for annual expenditures which is what i am suggesting for my supervisor and i hope that is also amended when this goes forward as well. Also, on the second item, which is the lower crocker area conve...

All, where the work and everything was done, and i mean that it is, and if it is demolished it is demolished and it is gone and it cant be replaced that, how do we subject it to the code requirements which they became effective after it was demolished and i dont have a clear answer for you, other than i think that this is a bit of an unusual circumstance. And it will be appreciate any further advice of the board and we cannot necessarily or may it already be passed the point of demolition and at which point, removing all or some of those walls, could and may not be an issue. Let me pose the fo...

Which are under the two phases and it is own partial, the Planning Department is saying that those have to remain . As you stated that this is a mess, the work that was done was done prior to section 317 of the planning code, and which regulates the demolition, and the staff, and in reviewing this, and the initially they had filed for the section 317 review but the staff reviewed calculations provided by the project sponsor which led them to determine that if they retained those walls, that it would not be classified as a demolition under the planning code and looking at the plans anew, i have...