Page 8 - Question Basis News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Put somebody on trial for a crime that serious is when they lay out and make records of everything they've done. the question we will get at tomorrow, though, is not just about what they did, but about who else might have been in on what they did. sedition, seditious conspiracy is using force to try to stop or overthrow the government. the justice department we know because they have indicted, they believe they have the goods to successfully prosecute multiple members of these para-military groups for doing that. but if other people, people without bin laden beards, people without neck tattoos...

Defying the subpoena was executive privilege, that president trump had a right to his counsel and he couldn't violate his sanctity of his advice as an official adviser to the president. legally speaking that is a pile of cornid nuts. i mean first of all, if you want to assert that you can't answer questions because of some assertion of executive privilege, a, the president, the former president has to assert the executive privilege, it's not clear that that ever happened here and alsoe, what you're t supposed to do is respd to the subpoena, honor the subpoena, sit down, hear the questions they...

Are already a whole bunch of guys about to be on trial for seditious conspiracy and tomorrow's question is as to whether or not the trump white house and other trump associates working on it with them, and should bear or potentially face the same criminal charges. now, i mentioned there might be more video tape tomorrow than we were otherwise expecting for your typical criminal conspiracy. part of the reason i think we should c be sort of ready for tt tomorrow is because of this, which we recently saw from "the new york times." hi, so what time is the whole political presidential situation hap...

Of whether or not there was a privilege. and it already been waived by the person who owns, at the current president of the united states, joe biden. but he needed to at least show up and assert it on a question by question basis. by refusing to appear at all, he broke the law and refused to comply with a subpoena. you can't remedy that after the fact, but i think he can create some confusion with the journey, by raising this issue that donald trump way the issue privileged in until july. now the other issues the money raised, is that he really wants to come in and testify before the committee...

But he needed to at least show up and assert it on a question by question basis. by refusing to appear at all, he broke the law and refused to comply with a subpoena. you can't remedy that after the fact, but i think he can create some confusion with the journey, by raising this issue that donald trump way the issue privileged in until july. now the other issues the money raised, is that he really wants to come in and testify before the committee. if he does, i think he's gonna come and drop some bombs, say a bunch of crazy stuff, i think they would be wise to take his testimony behind closed ...