in exchange for a information into the buyens. how do you dispute the fact? why would the republicans who went through the whole scam on this impeachment hearing. why change the course when they have seen everything? is anyone expecting something different from the minority report? nothing new. two things. that wasn t my question. why you call it a scam. this whole thing? this impeachment? come on, please. they have been looking for impeachment since election night. they filed articles of impeachment. they were tabled. answer the first question first. when i said they said this was sondland the ambassador admitted there was a shake down. how do you dispute that fact. and you can explain to me how it is a scam. what s the shake down? he asked a foreign country to
answer the first question first. when i said they said this was sondland the ambassador admitted there was a shake down. how do you dispute that fact. and you can explain to me how it is a scam. what s the shake down? he asked a foreign country to interfere in the election. he admitted he asked them to investigate and the president actually admitted it himself. nothing is new. there s no alert down there. there s nothing new. it s an old scam. we have not learned one new thing since the transcript came out. we all read it. america made up its mind. nobody changed their mind on this. nobody is being convinced this is not what the democrats have tried to do. does that mean it s not wrong? i ll give you this a perfect call. answer my question.
have ancillary consequences that harm biden in the long run. i don t know. nunes, this administration and every republican in washington has to deal with the first question first, right? they have to address you are right, dave, you are 100% right whether it s 1964, barack obama or all of the thing. in each of those cases what was necessary? transparency. at the end when you screw up you have to go to transparency and that s what they should have done with lois learner and the i.r.s. and what they have to do now. they have to deal with this before they can move on to nunes s suggestion it s about the iowa eye caucuses. julie: they admit they went ahead and spoke to the ukrainian president. the question is if there is quid pro quo. i m about to lose my voice. did they do it for $250 million
punishment. the chief executive came out and said, look, i recognize moving forward, probation is insufficient for these athletes, but basically, we had to start somewhere. so moving forward, they will specify and issue guidelines so if an athlete protests again, they will be subject to specific, clear and more harsh penalties. when you brought up the nfl, the reason we have those issues is because the khrebive bargaining agreement never addressed it. the reason we didn t have it with the nba is because it does. so it s obvious where the contracts lie and where they are vague. harris: why don t go back and fix that in the nfl? do you think having that specificity in terms of, if you do this, this is what happens, will keep people from protesting at the olympics? the first question first. yes. that is the subject of the continuing on going negotiations between the collective bargaining unit and the owners of the nfl. so once that started happening,
we re worried about what happened in north carolina, what happened in wisconsin and michigan and then new jersey democrats talking about redistricting. what is your position? obviously it was stopped. but give us a sense of the insider game there. let s take the first question first. i think we got to do something about climate change and this is not a partisan issue. this is about protecting our planet and so i support the idea of having a select committee over the next two years to debate and propose some of the fundamental steps we re going to have to take to deal with that. the green new deal as i understand it is about a lot more than that. it s about single parent health care, about guaranteeing jobs for every american. i really worry if we try to enact the entire progressive agenda in one fell swoop we re going to enact nothing and we won t do anything about climate change. we have to be realistic on that. on redistricting we as democrats and i think patriotic americans are