SFGTV November 16, 2013
Exemption and it was upheld of 2010 but reduced the size to 35 hundred patrons. In 2013, the Supreme Court found it was inappropriate with a sequa document and voted the 2010 conditional use. The city choose not to appeal that but the eir which you analyzed and the intense indication would have any impacts on the environment. The eir included it would not have any impacts nor litigation measures but the eir is recommending draft motions. In its 2013 motion the interpretation upheld the board of appeals termths that the masonic was constructed as a entertainment viewpoint not as a private lodge...