Page 167 - Ratification Aim Order Implementation Development News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Ratification aim order implementation development. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Ratification Aim Order Implementation Development Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170602:07:17:00

Knowing full well and negotiating that agreement in such a way he knows he can t possibly get senate ratification for that as a treaty if a subsequent president reverses course as a subsequent president is entitled to do because it s not law of the land. it cannot be that that creates a foreign policy catastrophe. that s wrong. i ve heard people say say there s no teeth to it and each country got to pick whatever they were going to do with themselves. why account urgent stoi back out of something that didn t really matter much? this is according to supporters of the president. peel back what you mean by no teeth. international law generally isn t really toothy. it s something that is observed among nations. i don t think you can say there is no teeth to something? which the united states agrees to contribute many tens of billions of dollars to the global climate fund. i don t think you can say there s mo teeth to international agreements generally. we re dealing here with the ....

Donald Trump , Landmark Climate Agreement , Law Of The Land , Foreign Policy Catastrophe , Isnt Really Toothy , Urgent Stoi , Wanted America , Mo Teeth ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170602:22:56:00

Trump were here and by the way, we can t get out of the white house whether he believes in climate change or not. but if he were here, he would say this, is that he was elected by the population of the united states, that he was elected, that he was elected on the campaign promise that he would pull out of the agreement and that he d probably say that the agreement is a treaty and that when it was first signed by the united states, it wasn t treated as a treaty, which would have required two-thirds ratification by the u.s. senate, but instead was just signed by president obama. had it been treated as a treaty, president trump couldn t even do what he s doing. so i think that s what he would say, that this is a job killer in the united states. how do you answer all that? well, the job killer is what president trump has done. clean energy can create millions of jobs, and it s already ....

Travel Ban All The Way , Climate Change , United States , White House , Us Senate , Wasn T , Campaign Promise , Trump Couldn T , President Obama Didn T , Job Killer ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20170602:17:49:00

Agreement or another agreement meet congressional approval. i think it is clear with paris agreement that there are concerns. the president expressed concern. and i have similar concerns that it should have been submited to the senate for ratification. what you actually agreement. we are talking about exporting innovation and technology to the rest of the globe, i would not say it needs to be submitted. but if you are setting targets and emission targets that are enforceable domestically through regulation and statute very much so. the voice of the american citizens need to be heard in the process. yes, sir. thank you, obviously a lot of people in the white house are not willing to answer the question on climate change. ....

United States , Emission Targets , Setting Targets , The Voice , White House , Climate Change ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170602:17:49:00

Revised paris agreement or another carbon emissions deal needs congressional approval? i think it s clear with respect to the paris agreement that there are concerns by the administration the president expressed this in his speech yesterday. i have similar concerns that it should have been submitted to the u.s. senate for ratification. i think it depends on the nature of the deal, what you actually negotiate. if we re talking about exporting innovation and technology to the rest of the globe, i will say not. i would say that s not something that needs to be submitted to the u.s. senate. i would say, however, that if you re setting targets, if you re setting emission targets that are enforceable domestically through regulation or statute, then very much so. the voice of american citizens across the country needs to be heard through the ratification process. obviously a lot of people from the white house are not willing to answer the president s view on climate change. so let s talk ....

Carbon Emissions , Us Senate , Setting Emission Targets , Setting Targets , The Voice , Climate Change , Zegz Fdecision Fo Country , White House , Ratification Process ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20170602:13:36:00

No big problem with staying in the agreement because it was meaningless but leaving the agreement means the apocalypse is at hand. the agreement itself was meaningless and not a treaty with no enforcement mechanism. activists and administrative state officials were going to put a bureaucratic architecture that would have cost $3 trillion over the next few decades and lost 6 million jobs and why it s so important when you enter into an agreement with other countries that you do go through senate ratification. because this was something that would have cost the american people, the american worker so much and when we made an agreement that allows china and india to do nothing for 20 years, where we re the taxpayers are expected the pay third world dictators for their climate change issues and we have to take all these costs you want to make sure the public is on board. if they aren t, we have no business entering into the ....

Enforcement Mechanism , State Officials , 3 Trillion , 6 Million , United States , Climate Change , Third World ,