Live Breaking News & Updates on Retaking Crimea|Page 3
Stay updated with breaking news from Retaking crimea. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Goal? you know, before the war it was russia that claimed that it was our goal to support ukraine in retaking crimea. we denied that. as soon as the war began, suddenly, there was this mission, because ukraine were the good guys, we would support anything they wanted to do. even if it endangered the american people and the world. russia has drawn a red line and threatened to use nuclear weapon. tucker: russia has to have its basic crimea, period, in order to be a functioning country. do you doubt their seriousness in responding in the most profound way if we were to back an attack on crimea? no, it s important to understand. it s not just russia s geostrategic interest, but it s the political interest of president vladimir putin. retaking crimea was his crowning accomplishment as a leader. i don t believe his government ....
. that s insane. when did this become the new goal? you know, before the war, itin was russia that had claimed that it was our goal to supporte ukraine in retaking crimea. begn and we always denied that. but then as soon as the war began, suddenly there was thiski mission creep wherne weree becal ukraine were the good guys, wewd would support them in anything t that they wanted to do, even if it endangered the american people, frankly, the world, becaus line russia has drawn a t line there and has threatened to use nuclear weapons and is weapng a credible threat in my estimation. so, i mean,on. russia has to have its basic crimea period to be reallybt t a functioning country. do you doubt athe allg in their seriousness in respondingo in the most profound way if ifac we were to back an attackt to on crimea? no. and it s importantategic i to understand that it s not just russia s geostrategic interests there, butnter it s io the political interests of president vladimir putin ret ....
two quick follow-ups. you noticed our military aid to ukraine has evolved with conditions on the grounds and the president previously said that these m1 abrams were needed to liberate ukraine. does the administration expect any operations moving forward that would include retaking crimea or lands lost during the russian invasion? i m not going to talk about ukrainian operations. i would never violate their operational security and certainly would not divulge from the podium what their plans and intentions are. i will only say this, that we do not dictate to the ukrainians how they operate, where they operate, what missions they conduct, what targets they choose. we help them with usable information and intelligence as best we can so that they can be successful, but these are their decisions to make, it is their country, their war. our job is to make sure they can prosecute that war successfully. and follow up to make sure i ....
The beginning. the white house will tell you of course ukraine wanted all of the military equipment all at once. what they are trying to do is make certain that those shipments match the evolving situation on the ground. i thought it was very interesting today that the president said that these tanks were going to be used to liberty ukraine when i pressed john kirby on whether that meant retaking crimea though and offensive action. he said that they weren t going to they weren t going to show their hand that that was a decision for the ukrainians to make. bret: mollie, this is a big rhetorical change and action from the beginning of his operation. definitely a major escalation in this conflict. the military establishment, the military leadership, which can include elements on capitol hill, the pentagon, the white house, people in both parties they seem to be less interested in thinking about how to win wars and really good about thinking about how to spend money prolonging conf ....
Back now with more tdr. press conference is underway in brussels. we are expecting the president any minute now. the european leaders are speaking. let s bring back chuck on a sort of dismissing russia as a regional power, almost saying that they were not worthy of all this attention, if you will. how deliberate was that on the part of the white house, and how thought out was that on the part of the white house? well, actually, if you ve heard john kerry s comments, he s been making that point for some time as secretary of state. it hasn t risen to the presidential level, but kerry has been making that point that, hey, this is a moment of weakness. that they are fearing not even having regional influence in the whole decision to deal and to do what he did in crimea, so that, ....