Scandal Part News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Did not discuss sources, methods or Military Operations. The president only discussed the common threats that both countries face. But anderson, nowhere in these statements that were released by tillerson, powell or the National Security advisor. Is there any kind of denial that the president released Classified Information to the russians, and of course thats a deeply sensitive topic because President Trump went after Hillary Clinton for having emails on her private server. H. R. Mcmaster will be briefing reporters tomorrow on the president s upcoming foreign trip. Obviously if mcmaster does ...

>> yeah, i think gloria made a very interesting point which is that this is almost a game theory. if you're a conservative writer or whatever, republican politician, you're sort of balancing, is he nixon? is he mccarthy? is he reagan? there were conservatives like george well who attacked, reagan didn't have until late in his administration the scandal part, but there were conservatives like george will who -- is he nixon? it's unclear. so i think that you're having people hedge bets and i don't know when the tipping point is going to come, but at some point, people will abandon him. >> jeffre...

Is he reagan? right and there were -- tlerp conservatives like george will who attacked -- reagan didn't have -- until late in his administration the scandal part. but there were conservatives like george will who attacked reagan ended up looking silly and stupid because he became in iconic protective placement and sevt conservative figure. is he nixon? it's unclear. and so i think you're having people hedge bets. >> right. >> and i don't know when the tipping point comes but at some point people will abandon in mass sfl if the president did what is the "washington post" says he did and "the n...

That there's a scandal part she's also now flip-flopped on three major issues trade, immigration, and crime. >> that's not going to hurt her with the democrats? >> it might not hurt her with the democrats. >> none of this is going to hurt her with the democrats is the takeaway. >> here's what i don't understand. why wouldn't someone else in the democratic party want to get involved? she was beatable in 2008. obviously she is beatable in 2016. and i know that liz warren flirts with the idea. she's sort of talked to some people about the possibility of a campaign. i actually think if one of them...