Stay updated with breaking news from Scoring points. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
public policy debate. it's not about accountability. it's about political revenge. that is what it's about. >> reporter: at the end of the day, omar will be able to be seated on other committees. it's not kind of a blanket ban like we saw with marjorie taylor greene in the last congress here, but democrats are frustrated by this. they say this is an element of republicans basically not having the votes for anything on their actual agenda that they ran on, so it's about kind of scoring points against the libs basically, and you're seeing this political tit for tat going back to the last congress. but that said, you know, the house is a majoritarian institution. if mccarthy's got the votes congresswoman omar will no longer be on that committee by close of business today. >> and garrett, there was also a new development regarding freshman republican congressman george santos. the fbi now looking into an alleged go fund me scam? >> reporter: it seems like every day there's a development about congressman santos. in this case we reported on this go fund me scam, i believe
there are so many questions about whether it was really sport or entertainment, you had to give the challengers a chance, did you not? yeah, absolutely. you've got to remember it as a tv show and it is for entertainment. it's all for the viewers. without the viewers, you have no show, but it was all full of competitive sports people and i, for one, did not want to lose so every time we enter that arena, we went into battle and you wanted to win, and our main objective was to stop the contenders from scoring points which was going to take them through to the eliminator so it was a multitude of different things and really it was about entertainment, it was about feeling good, light—hearted entertainment, did not matter how old you were, it was just one of those shows thatjust brought the whole family together and i think we are lacking in things like that at the moment. all full of social media and electrical items, social media and electrical items, so it would be good.— so it would be good. proper feel-good _ so it would be good. proper feel-good telly, _ so it would be good. proper feel-good telly, wasn't i so it would be good. proper
were mad at me for a while, they're now like i think you were right. friends on the left are saying this has gone way too far. we need to get back to the basics. when i start hearing that i hear hope and when i see things like chelsea boudin in san francisco getting the boot, have a successful recall effort that occurred in los angeles where we can put it on the ballot to get rid of him, when i see that it shows me the tide is turning but it will be a long time coming. here is the thing and i want to finish here. it doesn't matter if you get rid of individuals like gascon but you elect mayors and city council members who share the same ideology as gascon. you think you are creating balance. no, you'll get rid of one bad apple in the justice system and then create leaders who will continue to tie our hands in the name of scoring points with crazed activists and guess what? it will be the same cycle.
souvenir cocktail. michelob ultra maga. >> steve: ultra delicious. >> ainsley: $16 chicken caesar lettuce and parmesan. >> steve: don't discount it at $16. $14 the butcher's grind cheeseburger. $13 for wine. $7 for hot dog. $7 for gator raid and $6 for water. >> brian: scoring points for the every man and every woman. and every pronoun but justin thomas says this. $18 for beer, what? got to treat the fans better than that i understand that. but when people go there well i want to go there to drink the beer because there is a discount. one thing that that's an example of what his twitter page looks like. but one thing that comes to mind, you do get a season near. you have that beer you get to keep the glass. that's part of it. >> steve: you get to keep the can. brian, the can is a nickel when you recycle it.
leadership has enabled white nationalists and white supremacy and anti-semitism. history has taught us that what begins with words ends up far worse. gop leaders must reject the views and hold those individuals accountable. in the meantime there are other republicans who are weighing in like josh holly, he said what chuck schumer says is a violent aim at scoring points. marco rubio called in sick. also this is new, the top democrat says that he will still be holding hearings on the domestic terrorism and he is calling upon congress to address it. there is a push to tighten the gun control regulations, there have been acknowledgment that there is an evenly split undivided group.
this want a constructive dialogue. this is not about scoring points. >> thank you very much. sticking on this subject, a stark new warning of what overturning roe could mean for the economy. a roller coaster day on wall street. we'll check in right before the closing bell. upport underserved communities... ...helping us all move forward financially. pnc bank: see how we can make a difference for you. what's on the horizon? the answers lie beyond the roads we know. we recognize that energy demand is growing,
but have to separate that from the fact that the law. he's a first offender. this is a low-level offense that could carry three years in prison. in my experience it is very likely he would receive a probationary sentence if convicted. todd: will the defense regret putting smollett on the stand? >> hard things to say but sometimes you are driven by the actor with the defendant but especially if they feel they need to tell their story. that's not going to do him any favors because the jury will look at fine detail about everything he says. i love that lien in the cage and their scoring points. >> i wouldn't want to be on the other side of your cross-examination. hopefully never i will get there. todd: it is not like lying about lying. thank you. one of bill deblasio's final acts in office, vaccine mandate
opinion-laden news organization should be able to defend the factual basis of what it presents, even when it's strongly opinionated. fox isn't doing that here because they have already in a sense had their own news side undercut any foundation for making this credibly with a straight face. carlson doesn't care. he's interested in scoring points. he's interested particularly in getting in a back and forth with the rest of the media so that it's all vitriol and all open for debate. >> he's also interested in cashing the millions of dollars of checks. david folkenflick, thank you very much. >> you bet. as the right celebrates the rittenhouse acquittal, vigilanteism is an active threat to society. what can be done about it, ahead. ociety what can be done about it, ahead. esn't ha restaurant. if she did, it would be impossible to get in. she'd become famous overnight. she'd get talked into franchising everything.
is noteworthy that that has been deployed successfully about what the networks own official legal status of what comes out of that show is. >> you know lawyers will occasionally, say that is very usual defense to have, but they needed in the case of some of these more importance programs and making more wild outrageous and untrue claims. in the case of tucker carlson, what you are not hearing is the network defending him. or defend the facts. i have asked the question numerous times about this and other claims. and they have just pointed back to carlson's own claims. they have not stood by it. a news organization even an opinion laden news organization should be able to defend the factual basis of what it presents even when it is strongly opinionated. and foxes are doing it here. because they have already, in a sense, have their own new size undercut any foundation for making this claim credibly with a straight face. carlson, it would, appeared doesn't care. he is interested in scoring