Stay updated with breaking news from Section Two. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
When the Supreme Court considered the challenge to an Alabama congressional map that shortchanged the state’s Black voters, liberal justices expected the conservative majority to side with Alabama – if not gut the 1965 Voting Rights Act altogether.
When the Supreme Court considered the challenge to an Alabama congressional map that shortchanged the state’s Black voters, liberal justices expected the conservative majority to side with Alabama – if not gut the 1965 Voting Rights Act altogether.
"If you know thy enemy and know thyself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles." Sun Tzu – The Art of War So, all predictions are now laid on the table. Most optimistic, some...
(CNN) — When the Supreme Court considered the challenge to an Alabama congressional map that shortchanged the state’s Black voters, liberal justices expected the conservative majority to side with Alabama
A federal panel of judges smacked down the Alabama legislature’s bad faith attempt to redraw its congressional map Tuesday, giving the job to a special master.