Stay updated with breaking news from Self evidence. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
[national anthem] [national anthem] [national anthem] will: old glory, young people and old dogs morning. [laughter] for your national anthem right here on fox & friends. good morning, welcome to saturday. morning, guys. rachel: it s great to be back. pete: morning. how you doing? rachel: really good. how do you feel about dogs wearing outfits if they re patrioticsome. pete: only if they re patriotism. [laughter] rachel: they get better every single week. pete: how you doing? rachel: good. you know i saw will week. i stopped by. pete: oh, you went to his houses? rachel: yes. we are legit friends. if i go the nashville, i m going to your house. will: had coffee, sat and figuredded out the world s problems. pete: again? [laughter] rachel: the problems keep coming. will: that s about a half the time we get to the spend with you, four hours figuring out world s problems. let s figure it out. the latest on air national guardsman suspected of leaking classified ....
Constitutional system, that s nothing that can touch them. that s frankly false, the constitution provides a number of mechanisms for congress to restrain discipline or strip the court from the power of the purse. there s nothing in the constitution this is the justices have to have officers, have to have clerks. that s all or congressional discretion. from the fact that in my view i think in an reading of article three section two, congress can put regulations on the court with regards to ethics. can say that if you re going to hear this kind of category of cases, you have to not have any conflict of interest. it s the only thing congress can do. the fact that alito would say that publicly, having speaks to the imperiousness that has developed in the court. the imperious that is self evidence that the court needs to be restrained by another institution. there s also, i mean, when you look at that email that you ....
Restrain discipline or strip the court from the power of the purse. there s nothing in the constitution this is the justices have to have officers, have to have clerks. that s all or congressional discretion. from the fact that in my view i think in an reading of article three section two, congress can put regulations on the court with regards to ethics. can say that if you re going to hear this kind of category of cases, you have to not have any conflict of interest. it s the only thing congress can do. the fact that alito would say that publicly, having speaks to the imperiousness that has developed in the court. the imperious that is self evidence that the court needs to be restrained by another institution. there s also, i mean, when you look at that email that you just cited, melissa, i want to be scrupulously fair here, kenneth chesebro speculating that thomas would be their best shot doesn t mean that he would have been. this is a speculation by chesebro, and maybe he wouldn t ....
Specific time. at this time there is not a specific witness to say precisely where mr. kohberger was. unlike a lot of states, idaho requires defendants to provide the prosecution with a very detailed alibi during pretrial discovery. it has to include specifically where they were at the time of the crime. and the names and addresses of any witnesses who can corroborate that alibi. this gives the prosecution a chance to poke holes in the alibi before the trial begins. what the defense has done is apparently concede it will not challenge all the surveillance video and self-evidence that the prosecution says it has, putting kohberger in his car driving around before and after the murders. i m somewhat shocked that they would make that kind of an admission. so that tells me clear that kohberger does not have an alibi. ....